Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

[Montegriffo]

Muslim rapist = end of Western civilisation
White rapist = lying bitches
OK got it now....

[Speaker to Animals]

Muslim rapist = end of Western civilisation
White rapist = lying bitches
OK got it now....

Show me the evidence that he is a rapist and I will happily support imprisoning him.

[Montegriffo]

As soon as you come up with the Pizzagate evidence we'll talk....

[Speaker to Animals]

As soon as you come up with the Pizzagate evidence we'll talk....

The Pizzagate evidence? WTF? You need to talk to Alex Jones about that. I don't know anything about it.

At least I got you to admit your zeal to destroy men's lives is based on as much evidence as fucking Pizzagate..

[Speaker to Animals]

Just read their story. It's a lot of allegation and no substance at all. They also leave out damning evidence that would cast their accusers in a dubious light.

For instance..

In March 2015, Mr. Weinstein had invited Ambra Battilana, an Italian model and aspiring actress, to his TriBeCa office on a Friday evening to discuss her career. Within hours, she called the police. Ms. Battilana told them that Mr. Weinstein had grabbed her breasts after asking if they were real and put his hands up her skirt, the police report says.

The claims were taken up by the New York Police Department’s Special Victims Squad and splashed across the pages of tabloids, along with reports that the woman had worked with investigators to secretly record a confession from Mr. Weinstein. The Manhattan district attorney’s office later declined to bring charges.

But Mr. Weinstein made a payment to Ms. Battilana, according to people familiar with the settlement, speaking on the condition of anonymity about the confidential agreement.

The public nature of the episode concerned some executives and board members of the Weinstein Company. (Harvey and Bob Weinstein together own 42 percent of the privately held business.) When several board members pressed Mr. Weinstein about it, he insisted that the woman had set him up, colleagues recalled.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/us/h ... v=top-news

What they don't tell you was covered by other outlets last March:

She claimed that Weinstein, 63, a married dad of five, then put his hand up her skirt and asked her for a kiss.

She responded “No” and left, she told police. She later went to the 1st Precinct station house off Varick Street to file a complaint.

Weinstein was questioned by police Saturday, and Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. will determine whether to file charges, sources said.

But one law enforcement source insisted the case is “BS.”

“It’s not going anywhere,” the source said.

A spokesman for Weinstein said, “We are cooperating fully with the authorities and are confident that we will be fully vindicated. We will have no further comment.”

http://pagesix.com/2015/03/30/harvey-we ... 1419875282


Worse still, it turns out she was one of the women to make baseless allegations against Berlesconi for personal profit in 2011.

Battilana made headlines in 2011 when she and another beauty queen, Chiara Danese, offered lurid testimony about a sex party at Berlusconi’s pad near Milan in August 2010.

The pair told investigators they attended the party in hopes of becoming television weather girls — and were horrified when Berlusconi passed around a statue with a large penis, asking his female guests to kiss it.

“At this point, all the girls started to do erotic things to each other,” they alleged.

They also claimed Berlusconi touched their bottoms several times in “the bunga-bunga room” and urged them to undress, but they were terrified and left without participating.

Their testimony emerged as Berlusconi went on trial for allegedly having sex with an underage prostitute during one of his wild parties.

Battilana and Danese testified at Berlusconi’s trial and sought damages in a separate trial involving three people accused of procuring prostitutes for the prime minister.

The then-teenagers claimed to have lost job opportunities when their names were published online and in documents connected to the scandal.

Why wouldn't the NYT bother to mention that little detail? Strange, no? They have nothing but this woman's word that Weinstein assaulted her, they run with a story that paints him as a rapist, but they neglected little details like the fact that the NYPD concluded she was full of shit and that she had a history of making baseless claims against men in the past? Surely that information belonged in the story if they are being honest. But they obviously were not.


Look, maybe this guy is guilty as sin. I don't know. The point here is that the NYT is running a hit piece on him for some reason and they provided zero evidence to back any of this shit up while hiding all the damning evidence that casts this material in a negative light.

[DBTrek]

I don't think the sensationalistic media stories are nearly as damning as everyone who knows the man personally dumping his ass with a quickness and distancing themselves from him. He's that rich, powerful, and influential, and not one motherfucker is like "These allegations are ludicrous, no way he'd do that shit".
Nope.
His own corporate board kicked his ass to the curb, because they have no problems believing whatsoever.
That's pretty damning.

[Speaker to Animals]

People in Hollywood are dumping him because they are a lot of spineless progressives. They lack courage and conviction. Of course many of them will stab him in the back. It's in their nature. It's probably in his nature too. That's utterly beside the point. But while you bring it up, Michael Moore threw the BS flag on this story yesterday. That guy might have some crazy politics, but he's not a coward.

[DBTrek]

Mr. Maerov said Mr. Weinstein had been notified of his termination by email Sunday evening. The action was taken by Mr. Maerov, Bob Weinstein (Mr. Weinstein’s brother), Richard Koenigsberg and Tarak Ben Ammar. A fifth board member, Paul Tudor Jones, resigned on Saturday.

The firing was an escalation from Friday, when one-third of the company’s all-male board resigned and four members who remained announced that Mr. Weinstein would take a leave of absence while an outside lawyer investigated the allegations.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/08/busi ... fired.html

His own brother doesn't seem to find the allegations ludicrous.
One third of the board resigned their cushy positions.
/shrug

Media can say what it wants, I'm looking at the actions of those closest to the controversy.

[Dand]

When you hate women so much that you'll jump to the defense of a billionaire hollywood elite

[Speaker to Animals]

Oh, you are just figuring out that leftists are like those little miners in Galaxy Quest? Good for you. Now that you are catching up to speed, maybe focus on the lack of evidence in the story.