I'd say bigger deal now, since they've proliferated out of the bipolar Cold War confrontation into the multipolar, far less under control than they used to be, less likely that there will be massive countervalue exchange perhaps, but tactical yield counterforce strikes me as being more likely than ever before.Speaker to Animals wrote:It's pretty accurate. They can drop that thing right on your head if they want to.Smitty-48 wrote:They don't actually say who said it was the "most dangerous", they just air quote "military experts", but if it was really military experts, more likely they meant it is the most dangerous because it is the most accurate, a nuclear JDAM basically.
Tactical nukes were a big deal when the threat of a Soviet offensive was real. There really was no other way to counter it.
US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
Smitty what exactly is a neutron bomb?Smitty-48 wrote:Generally the neutron bomb was always the "most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced" but I suppose you could argue that it never entered full rate production.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
You remove the uranium casing around the thermonuclear warhead, and this allows you to flash bombard everything with neutrons, from a comparitively small airbursted hydrogen bomb, and the neutrons penetrate everything, metal, concrete etc, frying everybody with radiation, but since it is a small bomb and you pop it well above the ground, you don't produce any radioactive fallout, because you don't generate a mushroom cloud of irradiated debris, and the lethal neutron flash only lasts for a split second.SilverEagle wrote:Smitty what exactly is a neutron bomb?Smitty-48 wrote:Generally the neutron bomb was always the "most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced" but I suppose you could argue that it never entered full rate production.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
So... cancer bomb.Smitty-48 wrote:You remove the uranium casing around the thermonuclear warhead, and this allows you to flash bombard everything with neutrons, from a comparitively small airbursted hydrogen bomb, and the neutrons penetrate everything, metal, concrete etc, frying everybody with radiation, but since it is a small bomb and you pop it well above the ground, you don't produce any radioactive fallout, because you don't generate a mushroom cloud of irradiated debris, and the lethal neutron flash only lasts for a split second.SilverEagle wrote:Smitty what exactly is a neutron bomb?Smitty-48 wrote:Generally the neutron bomb was always the "most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced" but I suppose you could argue that it never entered full rate production.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
I don't always use nukes. But when I do I use tacticals. I'm the most dangerous president in the world.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
Oh, you die much faster than that, the neutron radiation is very intense, you are burned by it very badly, point blank right above you it would kill in a matter of seconds, your brain is just fried by neutrons, but even further away from ground zero, you're still going to die within a matter of hours at most, the radiation burns throughout your cells just cause your body to shut down long before any cancer cells could start to form.GrumpyCatFace wrote:So... cancer bomb.Smitty-48 wrote:You remove the uranium casing around the thermonuclear warhead, and this allows you to flash bombard everything with neutrons, from a comparitively small airbursted hydrogen bomb, and the neutrons penetrate everything, metal, concrete etc, frying everybody with radiation, but since it is a small bomb and you pop it well above the ground, you don't produce any radioactive fallout, because you don't generate a mushroom cloud of irradiated debris, and the lethal neutron flash only lasts for a split second.SilverEagle wrote:
Smitty what exactly is a neutron bomb?
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
GrumpyCatFace wrote:So... cancer bomb.Smitty-48 wrote:You remove the uranium casing around the thermonuclear warhead, and this allows you to flash bombard everything with neutrons, from a comparitively small airbursted hydrogen bomb, and the neutrons penetrate everything, metal, concrete etc, frying everybody with radiation, but since it is a small bomb and you pop it well above the ground, you don't produce any radioactive fallout, because you don't generate a mushroom cloud of irradiated debris, and the lethal neutron flash only lasts for a split second.SilverEagle wrote:
Smitty what exactly is a neutron bomb?
Nah. You will die instantly.
A cancer bomb is more like a dirty bomb.
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
Well... If you have to watch your family die, there are worse ways, I guess.Smitty-48 wrote:Oh, you die much faster than that, the neutron radiation is very intense, you are burned by it very badly, point blank right above you it would kill in a matter of seconds, your brain is just fried by neutrons, but even further away from ground zero, you're still going to die within a matter of hours at most, the radiation burns throughout your cells just cause your body to shut down long before any cancer cells could start to form.GrumpyCatFace wrote:So... cancer bomb.Smitty-48 wrote:
You remove the uranium casing around the thermonuclear warhead, and this allows you to flash bombard everything with neutrons, from a comparitively small airbursted hydrogen bomb, and the neutrons penetrate everything, metal, concrete etc, frying everybody with radiation, but since it is a small bomb and you pop it well above the ground, you don't produce any radioactive fallout, because you don't generate a mushroom cloud of irradiated debris, and the lethal neutron flash only lasts for a split second.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
The neutron flash is so intense that it's also effective against electronics, it fries circuitry too, so it's also an excellent counterforce weapon as well. It can disable other nuclear weapons witout having to blow them up directly.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'
Might be good for stopping ICBMs.