Fife wrote:Or Utah. Definitely Utah. Not Tennessee. Utah.Speaker to Animals wrote: Maybe consider Texas.
Yeah, I heard Tennessee is really expensive. Avoid this whole area.
Fife wrote:Or Utah. Definitely Utah. Not Tennessee. Utah.Speaker to Animals wrote: Maybe consider Texas.
Fair weather friends right thereSpeaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, what was I thinking? Appalachia is like a million per acre too. You guys definitely would not make it here. Maybe consider Texas.
TheReal_ND wrote:Fair weather friends right thereSpeaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, what was I thinking? Appalachia is like a million per acre too. You guys definitely would not make it here. Maybe consider Texas.
You did not just say that.Zlaxer wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, what was I thinking? Appalachia is like a million per acre too. You guys definitely would not make it here. Maybe consider Texas.
There's a reason the land is cheap....Texas sucks.
A type of tent made from bending hazel branches over, sticking them in the ground and covering them with a tarp. Popular with new age travellers but ancient in origin.TheReal_ND wrote:Bender?Montegriffo wrote:No, it's about protecting the green belt to stop over development. If you can buy a minimum of 13 acres it is possible to get residential permission as a small holding but not guaranteed.TheReal_ND wrote:That's actually fairly interesting though. I bet it's some sort of leftist policy to attempt to ensure small farming.
Best thing to do is buy woodland and hide your truck/bender in the middle of it. Or better still move to France,Spain or Portugal where you can buy a run down farmhouse with 10 acres for peanuts.
England is a green and pleasant land. Tough planning laws keep it that way. It also protects agricultural land for farming rather than losing it to housing development.Fife wrote:Disallowing normal people from owning property is a feature, not a bug, for serious statists.Montegriffo wrote:No, it's about protecting the green belt to stop over development. If you can buy a minimum of 13 acres it is possible to get residential permission as a small holding but not guaranteed.TheReal_ND wrote:That's actually fairly interesting though. I bet it's some sort of leftist policy to attempt to ensure small farming.
Best thing to do is buy woodland and hide your truck/bender in the middle of it. Or better still move to France,Spain or Portugal where you can buy a run down farmhouse with 10 acres for peanuts.
In the UK you probably must have a license from the crown to plant a potato in a window box.
Jesus Christ.Montegriffo wrote:England is a green and pleasant land. Tough planning laws keep it that way. It also protects agricultural land for farming rather than losing it to housing development.Fife wrote:Disallowing normal people from owning property is a feature, not a bug, for serious statists.Montegriffo wrote: No, it's about protecting the green belt to stop over development. If you can buy a minimum of 13 acres it is possible to get residential permission as a small holding but not guaranteed.
Best thing to do is buy woodland and hide your truck/bender in the middle of it. Or better still move to France,Spain or Portugal where you can buy a run down farmhouse with 10 acres for peanuts.
In the UK you probably must have a license from the crown to plant a potato in a window box.
Anarchists like yourself would have it covered with ugly houses and shanty towns.
Montegriffo wrote:Look, it's a small country with limited land available. If people could just build wherever they wanted just because they have enough money to buy some land it would spoil the countryside. What is so hard to understand about that?