Even the nose.. that's still there in indigenous peoples..

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
Genetics and morphology don't always go hand in hand.Speaker to Animals wrote:It seems to me the foreign origins theories of the Olmecs should have bared out in genetic evidence. If it were so, there had to have been some amount of breeding with Mayan and northern cultures. Those genetics should still be detectable today.
Even the nose.. that's still there in indigenous peoples..
It only has one branch of my family that I can find, and that's that Scots-Irish people.Okeefenokee wrote:family search doesn't look like it has anything for my family.
Alexander PhiAlipson wrote:Genetics and morphology don't always go hand in hand.Speaker to Animals wrote:It seems to me the foreign origins theories of the Olmecs should have bared out in genetic evidence. If it were so, there had to have been some amount of breeding with Mayan and northern cultures. Those genetics should still be detectable today.
Even the nose.. that's still there in indigenous peoples..
They'd have to be looking for it--and, of course, should they find it, they could always dismiss it as later "contamination" (for want of a better word.) So when it comes to Kennewick Man, the best they can tell us is "Kennewick Man is closer to modern Native Americans than to any other population worldwide." They said that genetic comparisons show "continuity with Native North Americans" The same study confirmed the mitochondrial haplogroup X2a and the Y-chromosome haplogroup Q-M3 of Kennewick Man, both lineages are found almost exclusively among modern Native Americans.Speaker to Animals wrote:Alexander PhiAlipson wrote:Genetics and morphology don't always go hand in hand.Speaker to Animals wrote:It seems to me the foreign origins theories of the Olmecs should have bared out in genetic evidence. If it were so, there had to have been some amount of breeding with Mayan and northern cultures. Those genetics should still be detectable today.
Even the nose.. that's still there in indigenous peoples..
Sure, but when you make a baby, it's not like alleles are taken from each side at random. You get long strands from each parent's DNA. It takes a really long time for that to get diluted. This is why companies that test your DNA can show you all sorts of genetic heritage going back pretty far.
If there existed this huge civilization in Mesoamerica consisting of people of Polynesian descent, then surely we would be able to detect that.
There's been some suggestion that the Hopi are actually Japanese because their weird ass language is not related to any other language especially to any nearby. Somebody noticed similarities to Japanese and If my memory is good, some people including monks were noted as sailed from Japan waaay back. I'm guessing when the Emperor actually ruled and was not a figurehead. It's possible.Alexander PhiAlipson wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valdivia_cultureTheReal_ND wrote:Yeah every Olmec head I've seen is decidedly negroid in features. Also, I suspect there is some Asian influence somehow in Guatemala. I think I told this story before, but I'm simply convinced. Basically I worked with a bunch of illegals and one of the group were a family that the Mexicans just called, Indios. They didn't speak Spanish to each other and I asked them who they were and they called themselves Tzotzil Indians. The eye shape and language pattern was decidedly asiatic though. I've had a hard time looking their tribe up on the internet so far but my phone just autocorrected the name so maybe I'll look again.
I wouldn't put it past the Japanese to get to the Americas. Off course the landlubber archaeologists rarely grasp the idea of intercontinental travel via "little boats."