Dude, what is this?TheReal_ND wrote:Have you read shut the fuck up you stupid cunt?Kath wrote:Have you read Outliers?
Also, how'd your husband like that new dragon dildo?
Metas?
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Metas?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Metas?
Not the whole thing, only standing in the aisle at the bookstore about a decade ago. He was also a guest on a podcast, "Freakanomics" I think? I'll look at it again but since he himself is no Meta, he's not looking at the right things.Kath wrote:Have you read Outliers?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Metas?
Better not to post medicated. Get some sleep.TheReal_ND wrote:A question?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 4149
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Re: Metas?
Those are fair questions and maybe there is the aspect that conflates uniqueness to meta. I am not sure how you define superior. I think of it more in terms of iconoclasts. Those that break the mold and are clearly cutting their own path through the jungle of life, come what may.Martin Hash wrote:You're the 2nd person to mention him. I need to give him another look.Haumana wrote:David Byrne
I'm not quite sure what I'm looking for? Every time I really dig into somebody's personality, they seem odd but not obviously superior, but maybe wisdom isn't a defining quality? Probably their insight is in another area that I can't recognize because I don't have it.
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Metas?
I wish I could have a 10-minute conversation with each of these people. I'm egotistical enough to think I could tell if they were "Meta," if there even is such a thing. People have been chasing after spiritual leaders for all of recorded history. Was it all just wishful thinking? My personal experience leads me to think not.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 4149
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Re: Metas?
Spiritual leader? I would agree. New insights and perspectives? Undoubtedly. J. Krishnamurti said something along the lines of, that once you heard his message then you should leave. The point wasn't to sit and listen to him.Martin Hash wrote:I wish I could have a 10-minute conversation with each of these people. I'm egotistical enough to think I could tell if they were "Meta," if there even is such a thing. People have been chasing after spiritual leaders with answers for all of recorded history. Was it all just wishful thinking? My personal experience leads me to think not.
Too many people just want to sit and listen rather than hear and go do.
I am curious to see where you take this meta list and what your results are.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Metas?
The whole premise of the book is figuring out what makes great people, great. You should at least consider it as a data point.Martin Hash wrote: I think? I'll look at it again but since he himself is no Meta, he's not looking at the right things.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Metas?
Will do.Kath wrote:The whole premise of the book is figuring out what makes great people, great. You should at least consider it as a data point.Martin Hash wrote: I think? I'll look at it again but since he himself is no Meta, he's not looking at the right things.
p.s. Need an excuse to go to Powell's Bookstore.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change