President Hillary Rodham Clinton

[C-Mag]

I heard it came out on the Wikileaks. She emailed some CF staffer about some shady Clinton ties and he told her to fuck off lol.

In the article they reminded us that there could be all kinds of evidence on Weiners computer about pedophiles. Man it's a fun time to be alive.

[C-Mag]

This is hilarious.
Two NYU profs run a mock debate with the intent to prove that Hillary only lost because Americans are a bunch of misogynists.
End of proving what an awful candidate Hillary is and how much Trumps message hits home.

Salvatore said that the two started the project, NYU explains, "assuming that the gender inversion would confirm what they'd each suspected watching the real-life debates: that Trump's aggression—his tendency to interrupt and attack—would never be tolerated in a woman, and that Clinton's competence and preparedness would seem even more convincing coming from a man."

As you might already have guessed, the actual performances didn't turn out that way. Instead of confirming the professors' assumptions, the performances suggested different conclusions. The style of Brenda King, the female Donald Trump character, was attractive to many of the audience members who assumed that Jonathan Gordon, the male Hillary Clinton character, would be even more clearly more competent than his opponent than under the original gender paradigm.

http://reason.com/blog/2017/03/08/gende ... ebate-reve

[Speaker to Animals]

I'm with her ^^^

[C-Mag]

I'm with her ^^^

[Speaker to Animals]

It never had anything to do with gender. I could imagine a woman that acts like Elain from Seinfeld saying the exact same things and mopping the floor with Hillary Clinton.

[Fife]

It never had anything to do with gender. I could imagine a woman that acts like Elain from Seinfeld saying the exact same things and mopping the floor with Hillary Clinton.

Eliane, maybe. Sidra, for sure.

[Okeefenokee]

I'm with her ^^^

[clubgop]

This is hilarious.
Two NYU profs run a mock debate with the intent to prove that Hillary only lost because Americans are a bunch of misogynists.
End of proving what an awful candidate Hillary is and how much Trumps message hits home.

Salvatore said that the two started the project, NYU explains, "assuming that the gender inversion would confirm what they'd each suspected watching the real-life debates: that Trump's aggression—his tendency to interrupt and attack—would never be tolerated in a woman, and that Clinton's competence and preparedness would seem even more convincing coming from a man."

As you might already have guessed, the actual performances didn't turn out that way. Instead of confirming the professors' assumptions, the performances suggested different conclusions. The style of Brenda King, the female Donald Trump character, was attractive to many of the audience members who assumed that Jonathan Gordon, the male Hillary Clinton character, would be even more clearly more competent than his opponent than under the original gender paradigm.

http://reason.com/blog/2017/03/08/gende ... ebate-reve

Good stuff. I found the whole play and watched it and kept an open mind, and I found myself hating the Hillary dude even more. If mansplainng was actually a thing, Hillary dude would be the poster child. The one clip you showed was really difficult to cite as an example of the whole. That was by far his best performance and Hillary's worse. Even GCF on the chat said "I think I am watchimg a murder on live TV." I swear there was millions of white working class people in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and PA that watched the first 20 minutes of that debate then when they switched the topic to race they changed the channel. They saw what they needed to.

[C-Mag]

Please post a link, I didn't find it.

[clubgop]

Please post a link, I didn't find it.

My wife will let you know.