Can't run and is useless for the purpose that it was built for today.Montegriffo wrote:Hwen Hoshino wrote:Wanker compared to who?Montegriffo wrote:
It means if you act like a wanker you will be treated like one.
Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
-
Hwen Hoshino
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
Picture showing the use of a trebuchet to throw explosives in Aleppo,Hwen Hoshino wrote:Can't run and is useless for the purpose that it was built for today.Montegriffo wrote:Hwen Hoshino wrote: Wanker compared to who?
You are still a fucking catapult
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Hwen Hoshino
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
Show me a top military using one.Montegriffo wrote:Picture showing the use of a trebuchet to throw explosives in Aleppo,Hwen Hoshino wrote:Can't run and is useless for the purpose that it was built for today.Montegriffo wrote:
You are still a fucking catapult
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
Changing the goalposts is a dumb way to attempt to make a point. Try harder catapult.catapult wrote: is useless for the purpose that it was built for today.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
He said it was useless today.
You showed people using them today.
He said show a winner using it.
Losers using useless tech is not refutation of the claim that they are useless today, aka, they won't win.
It's okay. I dig old stuff too. I just don't advocate that a nineteenth century mill is superior to a nuclear plant.
You showed people using them today.
He said show a winner using it.
Losers using useless tech is not refutation of the claim that they are useless today, aka, they won't win.
It's okay. I dig old stuff too. I just don't advocate that a nineteenth century mill is superior to a nuclear plant.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
He said useless for the purpose it was built for today. I showed one being used to throw projectiles at the enemy today. That makes it still useful for the purpose it was built for.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
Only useful if it can win.Montegriffo wrote:He said useless for the purpose it was built for today. I showed one being used to throw projectiles at the enemy today. That makes it still useful for the purpose it was built for.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
No, it's useful if it can throw explosives at the enemy. By your argument all weapons are useless unless they are hydrogen bombs.
If you were maimed by a grenade thrown over a building by a trebuchet would you still call it useless?
If you were maimed by a grenade thrown over a building by a trebuchet would you still call it useless?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
I would have shot it down 300 meters out.
J/s
But there is something to the idea that advanced tech isn't always the deciding factor.
J/s
But there is something to the idea that advanced tech isn't always the deciding factor.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Is there an avatar policy on nudity?
Infantry never gave up on bayonets did they? If a knife is still useful in modern war then it is crass to say a trebuchet throwing explosives long distances isn't.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
