THE ERA OF TRUMP

[The Conservative]

There is no hope for you.

I went straight to the rulings. What's your excuse?

[Ph64]

The left isn't losing their minds... Nope, not at all.

Increasing threats to Homeland Security include burned animal carcass left on staffer’s porch

https://wtop.com/government/2018/06/inc ... ers-porch/

[Speaker to Animals]

The left isn't losing their minds... Nope, not at all.

Increasing threats to Homeland Security include burned animal carcass left on staffer’s porch

https://wtop.com/government/2018/06/inc ... ers-porch/

I guess they are tired of all the winning?

[The Conservative]

The left isn't losing their minds... Nope, not at all.

Increasing threats to Homeland Security include burned animal carcass left on staffer’s porch

https://wtop.com/government/2018/06/inc ... ers-porch/

Time to start rounding up all the criminals.

[Speaker to Animals]

We could re-purpose all those holding facilities the USN is building for illegals to house the liberals..

[Okeefenokee]

There is no hope for you.

I went straight to the rulings. What's your excuse?

The ruling did not say what you think it says. I'm trying to help you and you're too dense to listen.

[The Conservative]

There is no hope for you.

I went straight to the rulings. What's your excuse?

The ruling did not say what you think it says. I'm trying to help you and you're too dense to listen.

So what do you think it says?

[Okeefenokee]

I went straight to the rulings. What's your excuse?

The ruling did not say what you think it says. I'm trying to help you and you're too dense to listen.

So what do you think it says?

Exactly what I said it says,

SCOTUS ruled that the gov't was mean in their process, not that they were wrong.

Here, take it from a lefty,

Homophobes Gorsuch, Thomas Wanted the Cake Shop Decision to Go Further

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Lts., v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission focuses on the treatment Masterpiece owner Jack Phillips received at the commission, saying he encountered “a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs motivating his objection” to making a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.
https://www.advocate.com/politics/2018/ ... go-further

Now here's The Daily Wire,

Here's What You Need To Know About The Masterpiece Cakeshop Ruling. Religious Americans Should Still Be Very Worried.

On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that a religious Christian baker could not be forced to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding – but only if the commissioners in charge of making such a decision were particularly mean to the Christian baker. That’s the actual holding. While you may be reading excited conservatives and Leftists claiming that the Supreme Court actually ruled in favor of religious freedom or religious tyranny, respectively, the case did nothing of the sort: the case merely stated that adding a layer of cruelty to a ruling against religious freedom made it unpalatable. Were commissioners to act in a “neutral” way and reach the same outcome, however, that might be just dandy.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/31422/he ... en-shapiro

[Okeefenokee]

They sided with the baker ONLY because they said the government openly showed hostility towards him. Had they made the same decision with no open hostility, it would have been fine.

Arizona ruled against a baker on the exact same type of case just a few days ago.

[C-Mag]

Anyone else notice the Left is targeting Females in the Trump administration.

Intolerant misogynists.