Top British Female Journalist Mentally Destroyed by Cyberbullying, Forced to Call in Security

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I don’t contemplate in my head issues of fairness, morals, and what-would-Jesus-do; I deduce the logic I’d have to write into the simulation to insure it didn’t become pathological.

p.s. In Hash World, aristocracies are bad.

??? Your autism went right by me.

[Martin Hash]

The best logiticians are like that. Obviously, I only expect a few people to be able to comprehend. Nobody on this forum certainly. I guess I’ll go watch some Jordan Peterson.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I know I'm just too durn stupid to get it, but I sympathize with the lonely isolation that must come with being so wyse as to alienate all us neurotypical tards.

[Martin Hash]

It’s a burden only the aristocracy can bear.

[Ph64]

I read his major income stream now is patreon. Before he recently stopped displaying how much he made it was up above $60.000/month. The Self-Authoring Suite he and some colleagues put together sells for $30. Not exactly the kind of money you would expect demanded from some cult leader.
https://www.selfauthoring.com/

Last I looked Dave Rubin was pushing $30k/month. Of course he pays the mortgage for his house (& garage studio) off it, plus has two employees (one being his husband/producer). L.A. is also expensive for housing, but I bet they're all making a decent though not extravagant living off it.

[DBTrek]

The best logiticians are like that. Obviously, I only expect a few people to be able to comprehend. Nobody on this forum certainly. I guess I’ll go watch some Jordan Peterson.

If a “logitician” can’t actually communicate their logic, are they still a logitician?



Logic would say no.

[Martin Hash]

The best logiticians are like that. Obviously, I only expect a few people to be able to comprehend. Nobody on this forum certainly. I guess I’ll go watch some Jordan Peterson.

If a “logitician” can’t actually communicate their logic, are they still a logitician?



Logic would say no.

The fact no one is persuaded by my logic doesn’t mean I’m wrong. I know accomplishments don’t mean anything but I have them, and I know money means everything, and I have that too. Logic would dictate that if two people had differing opinions, you have to look how that’s working out for them.

[DBTrek]

The fact no one is persuaded by my logic doesn’t mean I’m wrong. I know accomplishments don’t mean anything but I have them, and I know money means everything, and I have that too. Logic would dictate that if two people had differing opinions, you have to look how that’s working out for them.

Indeed.
Paris Hilton has more money and fame than you.
Which, by your own”logic”, makes her opinions superior.

That’s what I like to see - logic that we can put to the test.

[Martin Hash]

In the world of Royalists, that is absolutely true.

I hazard to bet you agree with way more of Paris Hilton’s opinions than mine, and more even of Bill Gates.

In Royalist World, credibility is proportional to cash.

[DBTrek]

They’re able to articulate and support their views, so on that count you’re probably right. It’s always easier to agree (or disagree) with something one understands, than to concur with vague, meaningless statements like “you’re all royalists”.
/shrug