The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by StCapps » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:49 pm

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:If you can cite a Quebec law that makes reference to race, please do.
Don't need to. Pan-Euro Ethno States aren't the only kind of White Ethno States. You don't need every single white cultural group to be included in an Ethno State for it to be a White Ethno State.

Ethno States where the majority of the population happen to be White, they are also known as a White Ethno States.
/shrugs
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by K@th » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:50 pm

This is the weird part, too. Nobody is saying that DSL can't move to a mostly white state. There are no laws that require us to get permission from a state to move there.

What's being challenged is how you enforce it, though. We simply do not have any mechanism in place to enforce it. Even if you shut down immigration completely, the birth rates will have non-whites in the majority in a matter of time, unless you put something in place to enforce reproduction rates to favor the white people staying in the majority.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:53 pm

StCapps wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:If you can cite a Quebec law that makes reference to race, please do.
Don't need to. Pan-Euro Ethno States aren't the only kind of White Ethno States. You don't need every single white cultural group to be included in an Ethno State for it to be a White Ethno State.
If the law doesn't make reference to race, it isn't a racial ethno-state. Sort of by definition.

You can easily prove me wrong by finding a contemporary law in Quebec that is related to race.

Having offered a method by which you can force me to concede, I have to ask, what evidence would it take for you to do the same?
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:53 pm

Lyin' Kath still at it.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by StCapps » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:55 pm

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:If the law doesn't make reference to race, it isn't a racial ethno-state. Sort of by definition.

You can easily prove me wrong by finding a contemporary law in Quebec that is related to race.

Having offered a method by which you can force me to concede, I have to ask, what evidence would it take for you to do the same?
I never said Quebec was a Racial Ethno State, I said it was a White Ethno State, an Ethno State that is 87% White, is a White Ethno State. Knock off the semantics.
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
*yip*

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by BjornP » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:58 pm

Capps, why do you keep describing Quebec as an example of a White Ethno state? It seems from reading a little about Quebec that the etnicity being promoted and protected there is French ethnicity and culture, and not simply some ill-defined North American amalgamated "white" culture or ethnicty. Meaning that an Anglo, non-French speaking immigrant is just as unwelcome culture-wise as anyone else foreign, right?
Last edited by BjornP on Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:59 pm

StCapps wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:If the law doesn't make reference to race, it isn't a racial ethno-state. Sort of by definition.

You can easily prove me wrong by finding a contemporary law in Quebec that is related to race.

Having offered a method by which you can force me to concede, I have to ask, what evidence would it take for you to do the same?
I never said it was a Racial Ethno State, I said it was a White Ethno State, an Ethno State that is 87% white, is a White Ethno State.
Great, so it isn't really analogous to creating a racial-state for all the reasons race isn't the same as ethnicity.

So quit fucking talking about Quebec because it doesn't fucking apply.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by StCapps » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:59 pm

BjornP wrote:Capps, why do you keep describing Quebec as an example of a White Ethno state? It seems from reading a little about Quebec that the etnicity being promoted and protected there is French ethnicity and culture, and not simply some ill-defined North American amalgamated "white" culture or ethnicty.
87% White + Also an Ethno State = White Ethno State
The obtuseness in this thread, off the charts.
*yip*

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by StCapps » Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:00 pm

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:If the law doesn't make reference to race, it isn't a racial ethno-state. Sort of by definition.

You can easily prove me wrong by finding a contemporary law in Quebec that is related to race.

Having offered a method by which you can force me to concede, I have to ask, what evidence would it take for you to do the same?
I never said it was a Racial Ethno State, I said it was a White Ethno State, an Ethno State that is 87% white, is a White Ethno State.
Great, so it isn't really analogous to creating a racial-state for all the reasons race isn't the same as ethnicity.

So quit fucking talking about Quebec because it doesn't fucking apply.
I never suggested creating a Racial Ethno State in the US, Quebec absolutely applies. If you think the most likely White Ethno State that would form in the US is a Pan-White Racial Ethno State, then you're delusional. A German Ethno State in America, far more likely than a Pan-Euro Ethno-State.
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:04 pm, edited 3 times in total.
*yip*

User avatar
LVH2
Posts: 306
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 4:01 am

Re: The left vs the 23% white separatist contingent

Post by LVH2 » Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:02 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:I think I see the problem now. We're obviously giving StA/StCapps too much credit. They haven't thought through their ideas.

So let's break it down to kinder-blocks.

1 - Seal off the borders completely. No new immigrants for.... 30 years.
2 - Watch the demographics. Brown-skins continue to impregnate and be impregnated by white-skins.
3 - America turns light-brown.
4 - StA/Cappy see this happening, and lose their shit.
5 - Re-segregate the schools and society.
6 - Welcome back to the 50s!
7 - America continues to brown.
8 - Welcome back to the 30s!


The idea is so absurdly stupid, that most of us are looking to see what you do around Step 5. You're still thinking that it stops at Step 1.
Another missing piece is where, 40% or so of the country goes along with the idea that they belong to undesirable races, but this is not racist.