Trump's Five Million

[TheReal_ND]

[clubgop]

"dark."

[brewster]

Get rid of it, make it so that when something is bought locally a percentage of the tax will go to the region and state. If not enough is going to the region the state pitches in with the money it would make from this. Make sure said money goes into a seoerate account so it can be tracked properly and not taken from by the state to balance its BS elsewhere.

Other towns and cities would do better than others, but if you do it that way, people would have more disposable income and actually spend it.

Wow, that sounds like a recipe for disaster. At least with the current system EVERYBODY pays, even renters ultimately. What's wrong with the current setup is it localizes resources so that poor districts have underfunded schools and rich ones opulently appointed ones. Talk about economic determinism. Want decent schools for your kids? Be prepared to pay either for real estate or tuition. Can't? Too fucking bad for you.

[TheReal_ND]

Not really. The HUD is designed to ship in your oppressed people's to nice neighborhoods away from those same people.

[clubgop]

Get rid of it, make it so that when something is bought locally a percentage of the tax will go to the region and state. If not enough is going to the region the state pitches in with the money it would make from this. Make sure said money goes into a seoerate account so it can be tracked properly and not taken from by the state to balance its BS elsewhere.

Other towns and cities would do better than others, but if you do it that way, people would have more disposable income and actually spend it.

Wow, that sounds like a recipe for disaster. At least with the current system EVERYBODY pays, even renters ultimately. What's wrong with the current setup is it localizes resources so that poor districts have underfunded schools and rich ones opulently appointed ones. Talk about economic determinism. Want decent schools for your kids? Be prepared to pay either for real estate or tuition. Can't? Too fucking bad for you.

I wish that were true. The per capita spending iis huge in places, like DC, NYC, and LA. Yet having some of the poorest performing schools in the country.

[brewster]

Get rid of it, make it so that when something is bought locally a percentage of the tax will go to the region and state. If not enough is going to the region the state pitches in with the money it would make from this. Make sure said money goes into a seoerate account so it can be tracked properly and not taken from by the state to balance its BS elsewhere.

Other towns and cities would do better than others, but if you do it that way, people would have more disposable income and actually spend it.

Wow, that sounds like a recipe for disaster. At least with the current system EVERYBODY pays, even renters ultimately. What's wrong with the current setup is it localizes resources so that poor districts have underfunded schools and rich ones opulently appointed ones. Talk about economic determinism. Want decent schools for your kids? Be prepared to pay either for real estate or tuition. Can't? Too fucking bad for you.

I wish that were true. The per capita spending iis huge in places, like DC, NYC, and LA. Yet having some of the poorest performing schools in the country.

Well, that settles it then. Because there can't possibly be reasons other than funding for why the poor perform poorly in school.

[TheReal_ND]

Asians are generally not poor I think. We need to spread them around equally to raise math scores.

[clubgop]

Wow, that sounds like a recipe for disaster. At least with the current system EVERYBODY pays, even renters ultimately. What's wrong with the current setup is it localizes resources so that poor districts have underfunded schools and rich ones opulently appointed ones. Talk about economic determinism. Want decent schools for your kids? Be prepared to pay either for real estate or tuition. Can't? Too fucking bad for you.

I wish that were true. The per capita spending iis huge in places, like DC, NYC, and LA. Yet having some of the poorest performing schools in the country.

Well, that settles it then. Because there can't possibly be reasons other than funding for why the poor perform poorly in school.

Who is disagreeing? The question then becomes why is the solution to chase good money after bad? What, besides the enrichment of teacher's unions and Democrat campaigns, is the ROI?

[The Conservative]

Get rid of it, make it so that when something is bought locally a percentage of the tax will go to the region and state. If not enough is going to the region the state pitches in with the money it would make from this. Make sure said money goes into a seoerate account so it can be tracked properly and not taken from by the state to balance its BS elsewhere.

Other towns and cities would do better than others, but if you do it that way, people would have more disposable income and actually spend it.

Wow, that sounds like a recipe for disaster. At least with the current system EVERYBODY pays, even renters ultimately. What's wrong with the current setup is it localizes resources so that poor districts have underfunded schools and rich ones opulently appointed ones. Talk about economic determinism. Want decent schools for your kids? Be prepared to pay either for real estate or tuition. Can't? Too fucking bad for you.

Ummm, everyone pays this way too. You get taxed on the money you spend. What part of that is so hard to understand?

[TheReal_ND]