You can't take a break from oiling up them Jew-hunting rifles of yours to make common cause with the sans culottes against the neo-liberals and technocrats?TheReal_ND wrote:You failed to contribute. Naming the Jew is constructive for some people.
That is sickening.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/04/goog ... apitalism/As early as the 1970s, however, the bond between capitalism and individual privacy was becoming unstuck. In 1977, the right-wing legal jurist Richard Posner put forward his “economic theory of privacy,” eventually publishing it in a paper in, aptly, 1984. There, he argued that individual privacy hindered capitalism by interrupting the free flow of information that markets need to be efficient. Posner concluded that “people should not — on economic grounds in any event — have a right to conceal material facts about themselves.”
Just to spice things up with a quote from a proper leftist rag.
Rights are just another business killing regulation.
Here is the situation, the majority of people overshare shit all the time... so why should they be worried about their privacy?Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, let's just sell everybody's secrets for profit. Fuck it. How bad could shit really get??
The Conservative wrote:Here is the situation, the majority of people overshare shit all the time... so why should they be worried about their privacy?Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, let's just sell everybody's secrets for profit. Fuck it. How bad could shit really get??
Those who are afraid, or don't want their stuff sold, already are taking precautions. But in reality, it won't matter...the government can get access to it at any time they want...
The internet was created, marketed, and represented as a secure communications tool. The impression was deliberately made, at every step of the way, on every single website, that your traffic was between you and the recipient. Don't pretend that there was some kind of "consent" made at any point for peoples' lives to be bought and sold.The Conservative wrote:Here is the situation, the majority of people overshare shit all the time... so why should they be worried about their privacy?Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, let's just sell everybody's secrets for profit. Fuck it. How bad could shit really get??
Those who are afraid, or don't want their stuff sold, already are taking precautions. But in reality, it won't matter...the government can get access to it at any time they want...
Wow... you are so wrong on so many levels...GrumpyCatFace wrote:The internet was created, marketed, and represented as a secure communications tool. The impression was deliberately made, at every step of the way, on every single website, that your traffic was between you and the recipient. Don't pretend that there was some kind of "consent" made at any point for peoples' lives to be bought and sold.The Conservative wrote:Here is the situation, the majority of people overshare shit all the time... so why should they be worried about their privacy?Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, let's just sell everybody's secrets for profit. Fuck it. How bad could shit really get??
Those who are afraid, or don't want their stuff sold, already are taking precautions. But in reality, it won't matter...the government can get access to it at any time they want...
Speaker to Animals wrote:The Conservative wrote:Here is the situation, the majority of people overshare shit all the time... so why should they be worried about their privacy?Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, let's just sell everybody's secrets for profit. Fuck it. How bad could shit really get??
Those who are afraid, or don't want their stuff sold, already are taking precautions. But in reality, it won't matter...the government can get access to it at any time they want...
Yeah, I can't imagine, TC. Wait till family court and you will find out..
Absolution Style by Premium phpBB Styles
