Trump's SCOTUS

[Fife]

[Martin Hash]

It's reassuring to have a conservative Supreme Court again but the cost was high. (I'm talking about a Trump presidency.) Feminism, Gays, Blacks & Globalism were the culprits; all social issues that ultimately mean nothing yet the Dems self-destructed over them?

[C-Mag]

It's reassuring to have a conservative Supreme Court again but the cost was high. (I'm talking about a Trump presidency.) Feminism, Gays, Blacks & Globalism were the culprits; all social issues that ultimately mean nothing yet the Dems self-destructed over them?

I somewhat disagree. The cost was to the nomination process. We didn't get here on this event alone. Partisan actions over time in Congress got us here. Both parties when in power over the last 25 years have been slowly destroying the filibuster.

[The Conservative]

It's reassuring to have a conservative Supreme Court again but the cost was high. (I'm talking about a Trump presidency.) Feminism, Gays, Blacks & Globalism were the culprits; all social issues that ultimately mean nothing yet the Dems self-destructed over them?

I somewhat disagree. The cost was to the nomination process. We didn't get here on this event alone. Partisan actions over time in Congress got us here. Both parties when in power over the last 25 years have been slowly destroying the filibuster.

Actually it wasn't the nomination process at all... we reverted back to the way it was before it was changed by the Democrat Party....

[C-Mag]

It's reassuring to have a conservative Supreme Court again but the cost was high. (I'm talking about a Trump presidency.) Feminism, Gays, Blacks & Globalism were the culprits; all social issues that ultimately mean nothing yet the Dems self-destructed over them?

I somewhat disagree. The cost was to the nomination process. We didn't get here on this event alone. Partisan actions over time in Congress got us here. Both parties when in power over the last 25 years have been slowly destroying the filibuster.

Actually it wasn't the nomination process at all... we reverted back to the way it was before it was changed by the Democrat Party....

Educate Me

[The Conservative]

I somewhat disagree. The cost was to the nomination process. We didn't get here on this event alone. Partisan actions over time in Congress got us here. Both parties when in power over the last 25 years have been slowly destroying the filibuster.

Actually it wasn't the nomination process at all... we reverted back to the way it was before it was changed by the Democrat Party....

Educate Me

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... te/513782/

[clubgop]

I somewhat disagree. The cost was to the nomination process. We didn't get here on this event alone. Partisan actions over time in Congress got us here. Both parties when in power over the last 25 years have been slowly destroying the filibuster.

Actually it wasn't the nomination process at all... we reverted back to the way it was before it was changed by the Democrat Party....

Educate Me

I believe he is referring to Bork. That followed by what they tried to do with Thomas. And then they filibustered Alito but was broken.

[StCapps]

Fuck the Senate Filibuster, y'all should nuke the whole thing, not just in certain situations, this shit is half measures.

[de officiis]

The rule change means Gorsuch and all future Supreme Court nominees can be confirmed with a simple majority vote and will no longer face a 60-vote hurdle.

What goes around, comes around...

[Okeefenokee]

The rule change means Gorsuch and all future Supreme Court nominees can be confirmed with a simple majority vote and will no longer face a 60-vote hurdle.

What goes around, comes around...

Yeah. Expect justices to see tragic hunting accidents every time congress changes hands.

Seriously though, I'm thinking it's probably not the end of the world. Just a new chapter, or an old chapter rehashed.