Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:36 pm
No, F1 has a positive effect on the improvement of the two things you mentioned. F1 has also improved safety with anti-lock brakes.
Your whole argument, on the other hand, seems to boil down to ''you can't be a true believer unless you act like a monk''.
That's the same sort of weak shit that says ''flying to a world summit on climate control is polluting the planet''.
It really comes down to the net benefit. F1 has improved fuel consumption and tyre life for millions of ordinary cars and those guys flying to climate summits are trying their hardest to improve the planet.
Now is that all you've got or are you going to say something clever next?
You carry goalposts around like Jesus carried the cross. It's actually really funny reading just how far you will reach to try and justify the same actions you scold others for.
You now say that one does not need to live like monk, only do things that are a net benefit. I already mentioned the recycling of the Christmas trees and planting new ones to replace those cut down. Naturally you avoided responding that to that point because you know it shows I do things that are a net benefit as you would call it.
Your excuses for F1 are a joke. Improved safety does not require toting F1 cars around the globe, along with all the carbon wasting gear and personnel that goes with it. This just shows everyone just how much of a hypocrite you are.
My argument was never that you had to act like a monk. It was that your judgmental, condescending, holier than thou (which is a bit ironic given your hatred of Christmas) attitude does not come down from a carbon-free ivory tower, but from a fossil fuel using truck home from which you watch carbon emitting F1 cars parade (not race) around the world, surrounded by the carcasses of dead trees you trot around to make toy slingshots. Hyp-o-crite.