Trump's SCOTUS

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:30 am

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:08 am
Ms Ford lied to Congress during testimony when she played dumb about polygraphs
Image

She in fact coached a friend on polygraphs years previous.
Yet it gets buried by our MSM. 99% of Americans have no idea the Gateway Pundit even exists. Go to Google news or Yahoo news and it's nowhere to be seen. Instead we get pages upon pages every day from garbage sources telling us how Swetnik needs to be heard and how he's not fit to be a judge because he showed legit outrage when having to defend himself against crap like this. The whole MSM is the Onion to me, but it's sad because to a large percentage they are still the source of truth.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28258
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:34 am

PartyOf5 wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:30 am
C-Mag wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:08 am
Ms Ford lied to Congress during testimony when she played dumb about polygraphs

She in fact coached a friend on polygraphs years previous.
Yet it gets buried by our MSM. 99% of Americans have no idea the Gateway Pundit even exists. Go to Google news or Yahoo news and it's nowhere to be seen. Instead we get pages upon pages every day from garbage sources telling us how Swetnik needs to be heard and how he's not fit to be a judge because he showed legit outrage when having to defend himself against crap like this. The whole MSM is the Onion to me, but it's sad because to a large percentage they are still the source of truth.
Swetnick is the least credible of all of them. With what I've read of her own words it appears to me that at a minimum she was at least enjoying being a voyeaur of gang rape sex scenarios if not enjoying being an actual participant.

Fact is you can't trust the MSM to give you a broad perspective of any news.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:36 am

pineapplemike wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:29 am
she is lying according to her ex-boyfriend, correct? what if he's lying?
So far 99% of the "facts" claimed have been un-proven.

What we do have is:
- Building permits and records about Fords remodel that contradict her testimony.
- Records of her flying many times great distances, which contradicts her testimony.
- Signed documents from "witnesses" that contradict....
- Swetnik's history of making past claims and being sued by a company for fraud.
- He likes beer and drank a lot when he was younger. So did I. I drink less than 1 beer a month today.

Nothing that proves he was a sexual predator. Yet the circus must continue.

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Hastur » Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:38 am

Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by pineapplemike » Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:47 am

PartyOf5 wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:36 am
pineapplemike wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:29 am
she is lying according to her ex-boyfriend, correct? what if he's lying?
So far 99% of the "facts" claimed have been un-proven.

What we do have is:
- Building permits and records about Fords remodel that contradict her testimony.
- Records of her flying many times great distances, which contradicts her testimony.
- Signed documents from "witnesses" that contradict....
- Swetnik's history of making past claims and being sued by a company for fraud.
- He likes beer and drank a lot when he was younger. So did I. I drink less than 1 beer a month today.

Nothing that proves he was a sexual predator. Yet the circus must continue.
i agree. my comment was in reference to the recent news last night that dr. ford, according to her ex-boyfriend, had previously coached people how to do a polygraph in direct contradiction to her testimony

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:54 am

You do not get to play it both ways. If her ex-boyfriend should not be believed without evidence, then neither should she be believed. If we cannot accept his word, then faggots need to shut the fuck up about "rapists on the Supreme Court".

But the real crux of the issue is that we can prove she fucking lied about a number of things. His sworn testimony only corroborates the evidence.

This bitch belongs in prison for a long fucking time for what she did to that man. All women who do this belong in prison.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:57 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28258
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:56 am

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Check this out guys...……………… Swetnicks Ex-Boyfriend revealed Swetnick likes Gang Bangs.
An ex-boyfriend of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of facilitating gang rapes, said she never mentioned being gang raped to him — but did tell him that she liked to have sex with multiple men at the same time.

“In fact sometimes with several at one time. She wanted to know if that would be OK in our relationship,” Ketterer wrote. “I asked her if this was just a fantasy of hers. She responded that she first tried sex with multiple guys while in high school and still liked it from time-to-time.”

~ Dennis Ketterer
A Lousiana Congressman has referred Swetnick for criminal investigation for making false charges. This all needs to be made public. Parade in a bunch of guys who succumbed to her requests for gang bangs, just put all the Nasty on the public record of this Nasty Woman.




https://truthfeednews.com/swetnicks-ex- ... ire-story/
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28258
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:57 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:54 am
You do not get to play it both ways. If her ex-boyfriend should not be believed without evidence, then neither should she be believed. If we cannot accept his word, then faggots need to shut the fuck up about "rapists on the Supreme Court".

But the real crux of the issue is that we can prove she fucking lied about a number of things. His sworn testimony only corroborates the evidence.

This bitch belongs in prison for a long fucking ti for what she did to that man. All women who do this belong in prison.
+1

The point is they want this to be a family court where women can say whatever they want and are to be trusted and mens testimony is not allowed.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek » Wed Oct 03, 2018 8:00 am

Pro tip: Proof is never derived from he-said she-said.

We got folks here as nutty as the Christine Ford believers who think their strong feelings paired with unfounded allegations of third-parties miraculously produces “proof”, but it doesn’t.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18665
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Wed Oct 03, 2018 8:02 am

The current Dem narrative is that Kavanaugh lied about being a virgin and how many beers he drank, so he lied under oath and should be impeached if he is confirmed.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change