Not feels, consequences.StCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:43 amRacist drivel and conspiracy theories are within the realm of free speech. You can fuck off with your "shut down all speech I dislike, because a mass murderer might interpret said speech as a justification for mass murder" bullshit, your feelz do not trump free speech, faggot.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:14 amIn case you were wondering how a creature like the NZ shooter is created.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:06 pmIn case you were wondering how a creature like Monty could possibly come about:
He's plugged into that shit. Decade after decade. Daily propaganda and programming.
They watch videos from football hooligans spouting racist drivel and conspiracy theories.
Shut them down...
Fake News
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Fake News
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Fake News
PewDiePie is not responsible if a fan of his goes out and murders a bunch of people, and says, "Subscribe to PewDiePie" before he does it. You're an idiot for suggesting otherwise, angry people going to lash out, no matter how much "hate speech" is on the internet, you dolt.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:03 amNot feels, consequences.StCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:43 amRacist drivel and conspiracy theories are within the realm of free speech. You can fuck off with your "shut down all speech I dislike, because a mass murderer might interpret said speech as a justification for mass murder" bullshit, your feelz do not trump free speech, faggot.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:14 am
In case you were wondering how a creature like the NZ shooter is created.
They watch videos from football hooligans spouting racist drivel and conspiracy theories.
Shut them down...
First you start blaming guns for mass shootings, now you are blaming free speech for mass shootings. You claim it's free speeches fault for radicalizing him, and the fault of guns for being a tool that helped him kill people. You just hate freedom more and more every time a bunch of people get shot, and you become more and more authoritarian with every incident, as if that will make you any safer, when in fact the exact opposite is true. You are just making it easier to kill people with your counter-productive bullshit, Mr. Consequences.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Burn in a grease fire, freedom hater. No liberty nor safety for you!
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Fake News
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.''
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Fake News
Democratic nations ''must try to find ways to starve the terrorist and the hijacker of the oxygen of publicity on which they depend,''
Margaret Thatcher
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Fake News
Banning free speech is not the right way to starve the hijacker the oxygen of publicity. Also Margaret Thatcher's response to this situation, wouldn't be to ban free speech, you word twisting faggot.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:51 amDemocratic nations ''must try to find ways to starve the terrorist and the hijacker of the oxygen of publicity on which they depend,''
Margaret Thatcher
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Fake News
Doing something, just for the sake of doing something, when it's counter-productive, is moronic. You aren't helping, you just think you are.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:46 am"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.''
Not wanting to ban guns or free speech in the wake of a mass shooting isn't doing nothing, it's just disagreeing with your methods of "doing something", because your plan is retarded.
You are basically acting like AOC, feigning like the Green New Deal is a good idea or banning guns is good idea, or banning speech you don't like is a good idea, because "no one else has tried, so I'm the boss". Lots of people are trying you moron, you just don't like the solutions that don't involve restricting the liberty of law abiding citizens, just like AOC.
Fuck the both you, and the high horses y'all rode in on.
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Fake News
That is exactly what Thatcher would do.StCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:08 amBanning free speech is not the right way to starve the hijacker the oxygen of publicity. Also Margaret Thatcher's response to this situation, wouldn't be to ban free speech, you word twisting faggot.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:51 amDemocratic nations ''must try to find ways to starve the terrorist and the hijacker of the oxygen of publicity on which they depend,''
Margaret Thatcher
She passed laws to prevent IRA terrorists/sympathisers broadcasting their views on British media.
Interviewing anyone who supported terrorism was against the law.
The law was later abolished by Blair's New Labour.
Also, what's with all the name calling?
Are you a 12 year old who can't disagree with someone without calling them a faggot?
Last edited by Montegriffo on Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Fake News
You want to ban free speech, you want to ban guns, if you hold either of those two positions, then you deserve to be insulted.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:26 amAlso, what's with all the name calling?
Are you a 12 year old who can't disagree with someone without calling them a faggot?
I can disagree with you without insulting you, but I choose to insult you and disagree with you on this occasion, because you're being a giant asshole who wants to take away people's freedom, so you can feel safer, even though you are less safe by employing such freedom hating methods.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Fake News
I want to restrict hate speech and I want to regulate gun ownership.StCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:28 amYou want to ban free speech, you want to ban guns, if you hold either of those two positions, then you deserve to be insulted.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:26 amAlso, what's with all the name calling?
Are you a 12 year old who can't disagree with someone without calling them a faggot?
Ban is your word, not mine.
I can also make my arguments without resorting to childish name-calling.
You resort to strawmen and insults and repeating yourself over and over until people give up.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Fake News
I call like I see it, you just don't like it, AOC. Restricting hate speech and federal regulation of gun ownership isn't going to make you any safer, it just makes everyone less free for no pay off.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:37 amI want to restrict hate speech and I want to regulate gun ownership.
Ban is your word, not mine.
I can also make my arguments without resorting to childish name-calling.
You resort to strawmen and insults and repeating yourself over and over until people give up.
You just hate freedom, and you aren't fooling anyone on this forum by feigning like you don't. Take your Temperance Lady solutions, and shove them up your ass.
*yip*