CS 317 Shades of Grey

[StCapps]

Yo SIFCLFs, Millions of Americans didn't vote to go to war with Russia, just because they voted for Clinton.
Did you ever stop to think the people who voted for her didn't think that she wanted to go to war with Russia?

No, you just assumed they thought she wanted to go war with Russia and yet they voted for her anyway? Really? How dumb are you?

[Speaker to Animals]

A vote for Clinton was literally a vote to go to war with Russia whether you want to or not, since that's what the bitch was gunning for. She didn't even hide it.

Hillary: I want to establish a no-fly zone over Syria.

What do you think that entails, genius?

Also, in another thread, we were just discussing how this political subversion game leads to nuclear exchanges. In my opinion, Clinton's affecting a fascist coup in Ukraine put closer to war with Russia than we have been for a long, long time. Add to that her helping to fund and create ISIS and Al Nusra in Syria. then she helped create the biggest demographic invasion of Europe since collapse of the Roman Empire. How much shit do you think the world was willing to take from this failure of a human being?

[StCapps]

A vote for Clinton was literally a vote to go to war with Russia whether you want to or not, since that's what the bitch was gunning for. She didn't even hide it.

Hillary: I want to establish a no-fly zone over Syria.

What do you think that entails, genius?

You trust Clinton to deliver on her campaign promises? Interesting.

[Speaker to Animals]

A vote for Clinton was literally a vote to go to war with Russia whether you want to or not, since that's what the bitch was gunning for. She didn't even hide it.

Hillary: I want to establish a no-fly zone over Syria.

What do you think that entails, genius?

You trust Clinton to deliver on her campaign promises? Interesting.

On that? Hell, yes. If a candidate says she wants to do things that are likely to result in a shooting war with Russia, then I take her for her word and I will NOT vote for her, since voting for such a candidate is literally the same thing as voting for war with Russia.

[Speaker to Animals]

If Clinton became president and all that shit she and Obama were doing not only didn't stop but ramped up, I wouldn't blame people for threatening to launch. These people don't belong in office. They are dangers to the world.

Trump might be an asshole, but fucking stop with the false equivalences. We had no real choice but to elect the guy whether any of us like him or not.

[StCapps]

On that? Hell, yes. If a candidate says she wants to do things that are likely to result in a shooting war with Russia, then I take her for her word and I will NOT vote for her, since voting for such a candidate is literally the same thing as voting for war with Russia.

Keep on believing in politicians delivering on ludicrous campaign promises, I remain skeptical of your assertion that if Clinton was POTUS you'd be at war with Russia. Sounds like you've just been huffing the siffcliff paint.

[ssu]

Yeah, it was the Russians that got her to lie so much twenty years ago that Norm got fired for calling her out on it, all so they could steal the 2016 election.

Take your tinfiol hat off, reshape it into a pipe, and smoke enough crack to kill you, you fucking moron.

Now there's classic strawman: as if I've ever said that the Russians stole the election. (Hint: Hillary was a disaster for candidate)

They handled information operation quite well. Going too far, really doing funnybusiness with the actual election and likely then the US would have acted. Seems people are incapable of thinking about these things in any other way than the media discourse. Or simply assume things without reading them.

Basically it's just Trump himself (or perhaps him listening to Jared) that made it this thing so that we have ended up with the Mueller investigation. Otherwise it would have been a formal investigation that would have declared "Yup, the Russkies had an info ops running last election. Period."

Something the American IC would be incapable of doing in Russia, btw.

[Speaker to Animals]

On that? Hell, yes. If a candidate says she wants to do things that are likely to result in a shooting war with Russia, then I take her for her word and I will NOT vote for her, since voting for such a candidate is literally the same thing as voting for war with Russia.

Keep on believing in politicians delivering on ludicrous campaign promises, I remain skeptical of your assertion that if Clinton was POTUS you'd be at war with Russia. Sounds like you've just been huffing the siffcliff paint.

Dude, if a candidate says she wants to do things that are likely to start a shooting war with Russia, then voting for that candidate is literally a vote for war with Russia, whether you choose to believe the candidate or not. The fact that you don't understand this illustrates why we need to walk back universal enfranchisement. This is stupid, capps.

[StCapps]

On that? Hell, yes. If a candidate says she wants to do things that are likely to result in a shooting war with Russia, then I take her for her word and I will NOT vote for her, since voting for such a candidate is literally the same thing as voting for war with Russia.

Keep on believing in politicians delivering on ludicrous campaign promises, I remain skeptical of your assertion that if Clinton was POTUS you'd be at war with Russia. Sounds like you've just been huffing the siffcliff paint.

Dude, if a candidate says she wants to do things that are likely to start a shooting war with Russia, then voting for that candidate is literally a vote for war with Russia, whether you choose to believe the candidate or not. The fact that you don't understand this illustrates why we need to walk back universal enfranchisement. This is stupid, capps.

No it isn't literally a vote for war with Russia, you're just an assclown who thinks it is." If the candidate I didn't want to win had won, then it would have been WWIII!", you sound like a fucking Democrat under the Nuclear Hitler delusion.

[Speaker to Animals]

Keep on believing in politicians delivering on ludicrous campaign promises, I remain skeptical of your assertion that if Clinton was POTUS you'd be at war with Russia. Sounds like you've just been huffing the siffcliff paint.

Dude, if a candidate says she wants to do things that are likely to start a shooting war with Russia, then voting for that candidate is literally a vote for war with Russia, whether you choose to believe the candidate or not. The fact that you don't understand this illustrates why we need to walk back universal enfranchisement. This is stupid, capps.

No it isn't literally a vote for war with Russia, you're just an assclown who thinks it is.

If a candidate is running on a platform to do <x>, then a vote for that candidate is literally a vote in support of <x>.

This isn't rocket science, capps. If you don't understand that, I don't know what to tell you.

Maybe the driving motivation for many people was because the candidate had a particular kind of genitlia, but they still voted for <x>, and in either case they proved they probably shouldn't be voting since they voted for a fucking vagina instead of policies and the policies tabled by the person with said vagina entail a shooting war with Russia.