President Hillary Rodham Clinton

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by The Conservative » Mon Sep 11, 2017 12:22 pm

Wonder how true this is:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... zZCdUw3Unl
More than 6,500 people registered to vote in New Hampshire on Nov. 8 using out-of-state driver’s licenses, and since then the vast majority have neither obtained an in-state license nor registered a motor vehicle.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 11, 2017 12:58 pm

pineapplemike wrote:
C-Mag wrote: Surely she mentioned that incident in her book among the reasons as to why she lost,

Sure. Probably a few pages before she claimed we didn't elect her because she is a woman.

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by pineapplemike » Mon Sep 11, 2017 2:27 pm



landslide primary victory LOL

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Sep 11, 2017 2:51 pm

pineapplemike wrote:

landslide primary victory LOL
Delusional.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:28 pm

When she lost the general election, she was too busy crying and throwing things at people to give a concession speech. We dodged a bullet that night.

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by pineapplemike » Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:43 pm

Oh man, this one's even better, feels like I'm in the Matrix dodging bullets as I'm watching it


User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:07 pm

Nobody wants their mother in law in charge of nuclear codes. Case closed.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by clubgop » Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:04 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
pineapplemike wrote:

landslide primary victory LOL
Delusional.
Oh look at that, my two favorite poster on primaries. Let's look at the landslide claim. With the popular vote being 16,914,722 vs. 13,206,428 that is 55 to 43, so 13 points. That is a pretty definitive victory, I wouldn't qualify it as a landslide but delusional. Nope. Take a look at the facts not the media horse race narrative.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:07 pm

clubgop wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
pineapplemike wrote:

landslide primary victory LOL
Delusional.
Oh look at that, my two favorite poster on primaries. Let's look at the landslide claim. With the popular vote being 16,914,722 vs. 13,206,428 that is 55 to 43, so 13 points. That is a pretty definitive victory, I wouldn't qualify it as a landslide but delusional. Nope. Take a look at the facts not the media horse race narrative.
It's a good thing that we don't go by popular vote, remember? 8-)
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:10 pm

She'd have lost even worse if we did go by popular vote. Do you have any idea how many people in deep blue cities don't vote or play strategic voting games with third parties because the electoral system effectively disenfranchises them?

This retarded meme just won't die. Liberals are not as powerful as they think they are. They have cities locked down, but that doesn't mean they control all the minds of those cities. There exist large minorities of dissenters there.

That's beside the problem of all the illegal votes in areas where they didn't check identification, or deliberately registered out of state voters as happened apparently in New Hampshire.

If we went to a popular vote next presidential cycle and implemented strict voter identification laws, the democrats would be dead for good as a national party. They'd still control some cities, and maybe a few senators, but that's it. Other than that, their main national presence would be from congressional representatives in urban districts, which isn't enough to matter.