THE ERA OF TRUMP

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:29 am

Hopefully he is a vegetarian and loves dogs.

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by nmoore63 » Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:39 am

Martin Hash wrote:
MilSpecs wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:Obama hired people from a list given to him by Goldman-Sachs, and hardly anyone left. I like churn much better.
I would too if I didn't see who's coming next. Chaos leads to strongmen.
Yeah, good point.
Such is the risk of freedom.
It takes courage to be free.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:40 am

Image


We already know what comes next. It's time for America to make gains again.

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by MilSpecs » Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:48 am

DrYouth wrote:
MilSpecs wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:Obama hired people from a list given to him by Goldman-Sachs, and hardly anyone left. I like churn much better.
I would too if I didn't see who's coming next.
Who's coming next?
A strongman.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by MilSpecs » Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:49 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:Hopefully he is a vegetarian and loves dogs.
He will eat dogs.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by MilSpecs » Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:51 am

nmoore63 wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:
MilSpecs wrote:
I would too if I didn't see who's coming next. Chaos leads to strongmen.
Yeah, good point.
Such is the risk of freedom.
It takes courage to be free.
I can't think of a much less free way of life than living under a strongman. You'll be free to praise him, I guess.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by DrYouth » Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:56 am

MilSpecs wrote:A strongman.
Why do you hate strong men so much?

:twisted:
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by DBTrek » Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:59 am

They don’t have to be strong. It’s en vogue to hate men and manliness in general.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by nmoore63 » Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:05 am

MilSpecs wrote:
nmoore63 wrote:
Martin Hash wrote: Yeah, good point.
Such is the risk of freedom.
It takes courage to be free.
I can't think of a much less free way of life than living under a strongman. You'll be free to praise him, I guess.
You misunderstand.
I do not discount that it could work out badly.
But it is only the only way.

I will not live under the Ancien Regime.

t could work out with the Reign of Terror. It could work out like Napoleon. It could work out like the Paris Commune. It could work out like De Gaulle.

But I will risk it.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:06 am

DBTrek wrote:They don’t have to be strong. It’s en vogue to hate men and manliness in general.

Yeah, chicks talk a lot of shit against masculinity these days, but they prefer to fuck masculine men and they'd prefer to vote for a man who panders to them rather than another woman. That's just indisputable at this point. It's fucking weird, but there it is.

Put a Dwayne Johnson in the campaign, talking about so-called "women's issues", against any woman, and he still destroys his opposition. That's just how it is. Trump was talking about grabbing chicks by the pussy, and how women don't really have it that bad ("You'll get paid the same for doing just as good of a job"), and he still won.

It's possible to exploit women's evolutionary biology even in politics like this.

I will grant that the main thing that saved Trump was that Hillary played FAR worse to the male population, actively campaigned against men in general, and lost the male vote for the most part. But still, Trump split the female vote. That was hilarious.