THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Hopefully he is a vegetarian and loves dogs.
-
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Such is the risk of freedom.Martin Hash wrote:Yeah, good point.MilSpecs wrote:I would too if I didn't see who's coming next. Chaos leads to strongmen.Martin Hash wrote:Obama hired people from a list given to him by Goldman-Sachs, and hardly anyone left. I like churn much better.
It takes courage to be free.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
We already know what comes next. It's time for America to make gains again.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
A strongman.DrYouth wrote:Who's coming next?MilSpecs wrote:I would too if I didn't see who's coming next.Martin Hash wrote:Obama hired people from a list given to him by Goldman-Sachs, and hardly anyone left. I like churn much better.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
He will eat dogs.Speaker to Animals wrote:Hopefully he is a vegetarian and loves dogs.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I can't think of a much less free way of life than living under a strongman. You'll be free to praise him, I guess.nmoore63 wrote:Such is the risk of freedom.Martin Hash wrote:Yeah, good point.MilSpecs wrote:
I would too if I didn't see who's coming next. Chaos leads to strongmen.
It takes courage to be free.
-
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
- Location: Canadastan
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Why do you hate strong men so much?MilSpecs wrote:A strongman.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
They don’t have to be strong. It’s en vogue to hate men and manliness in general.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
You misunderstand.MilSpecs wrote:I can't think of a much less free way of life than living under a strongman. You'll be free to praise him, I guess.nmoore63 wrote:Such is the risk of freedom.Martin Hash wrote: Yeah, good point.
It takes courage to be free.
I do not discount that it could work out badly.
But it is only the only way.
I will not live under the Ancien Regime.
t could work out with the Reign of Terror. It could work out like Napoleon. It could work out like the Paris Commune. It could work out like De Gaulle.
But I will risk it.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
DBTrek wrote:They don’t have to be strong. It’s en vogue to hate men and manliness in general.
Yeah, chicks talk a lot of shit against masculinity these days, but they prefer to fuck masculine men and they'd prefer to vote for a man who panders to them rather than another woman. That's just indisputable at this point. It's fucking weird, but there it is.
Put a Dwayne Johnson in the campaign, talking about so-called "women's issues", against any woman, and he still destroys his opposition. That's just how it is. Trump was talking about grabbing chicks by the pussy, and how women don't really have it that bad ("You'll get paid the same for doing just as good of a job"), and he still won.
It's possible to exploit women's evolutionary biology even in politics like this.
I will grant that the main thing that saved Trump was that Hillary played FAR worse to the male population, actively campaigned against men in general, and lost the male vote for the most part. But still, Trump split the female vote. That was hilarious.