THE ERA OF TRUMP

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:30 am

Image

Image

Image


Wonderful country. Great people. Enjoy the food diversity.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by K@th » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:31 am

Trump cancels Britain trip, blames Obama for 'peanuts' London embassy deal
“Many Londoners have made it clear that Donald Trump is not welcome here while he is pursuing such a divisive agenda,” London Mayor Sadiq Khan, who has often exchanged barbs with Trump on social media, tweeted.

“It seems he’s finally got the message.”
Also noteworthy, this Embassy deal started under Bush, not Obama.

I look forward to hearing something something Hillary something something London shithole.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26030
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by TheReal_ND » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:32 am

Image
A-and then.... he undressed me with his eyes

And touched.... my naughty place

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by DBTrek » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:35 am

Kath wrote:
Also noteworthy, this Embassy deal started under Bush, not Obama.

I look forward to hearing something something Hillary something something London shithole.
... but she’s NOT a Hillary supporter/defender.

:lol:

She’s totally against both sides.
But if you point out the Dem side her anger will last a couple pages.
But she’s independent, neutral, and definitely not “with her”.

Stop laughing guys.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26030
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by TheReal_ND » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:38 am

Image

When your third cousin wins the immigration lottery and gets a ticket out of your shithole country

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by K@th » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:38 am

I should have predicted someone would accuse me of loving Hillary because Trump said something stupid. Yes, totally related.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by DBTrek » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:40 am

Kath wrote:I should have predicted someone would accuse me of loving Hillary because Trump said something stupid. Yes, totally related.
It’s your prolonged and predictable negative reaction to me pointing out there was no non-banksters viable option that gives it away.

Truly neutral people wouldn’t still be bitterly referencing it, because it’s obviously true.
/shrug
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26030
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by TheReal_ND » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:42 am

Image
His comments were like a cannon it was like BAHDAHBLAHDA

I'm literally shaking

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by K@th » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:42 am

DBTrek wrote:
Kath wrote:I should have predicted someone would accuse me of loving Hillary because Trump said something stupid. Yes, totally related.
It’s your prolonged and predictable negative reaction to me pointing out there was no non-banksters viable option that gives it away.

Truly neutral people wouldn’t still be bitterly referencing it, because it’s obviously true.
/shrug
OIC. Can you point to me saying that Hillary was against the banksters? I must have typed that in a huge fog. I'll wait while you go find it.

Was it before or after I said this?
Kath wrote:
Agree completely that all candidates are pro banksters, but that doesn't mean we should swallow it without calling it out.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by DBTrek » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:48 am

You’re still bitching about Hillary being mentioned several posts after everyone else dropped it and moved on.
What am I supposed to prove again?
That you’re not considerably more invested than defending Hillary than the rest of us?
You’re writing that proof for me with each additional post on the subject.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"