Consistent enforcement of the rules is anathema to Kath's moderating style, she is the queen of the double standard, just ask clubgop. So that leaves, burn it to the ground.Smitty-48 wrote:Enforce your rule for all threads, or none at all, I'll abide by a rule which is enforced consistently, but one rule for the Montylympics and no rules for anything else, that, NHL hockey talk, we be forced to burn to the ground.Kath wrote:Wrong again. Thanks for playing, "What is Kath thinking, now?"Smitty-48 wrote:The point is taken, you want a safe space for off topic bullshit in the threads, but only for the thread which Monty has bitched slapped you into saving, all other threads are left at the mercy of spamming "because Olympics". Curiouser and curiouser, that.
Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
why even have thread titles if free speech is truly the goal? or perhaps are there self-imposed limits on free speech for the benefit of the community to exchange comments within some framework of order
its like no one here has ever used a message board before, all this talk about censorship and free speech is just silly
its like no one here has ever used a message board before, all this talk about censorship and free speech is just silly
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
i thought my jim acosta comparison was pretty good and im disappointed it got buried
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I don't believe I'm being a dick, I'm quite prepared to abide by your rule, if you enforce it consistently, let me know when you are prepared to be logically consistent, and I will abide without reservation.Kath wrote:Have a party. Being a dick is your thing, I guess. It's all good.Smitty-48 wrote:Enforce your rule for all threads, or none at all, I'll abide by a rule which is enforced consistently, but one rule for the Montylympics and no rules for anything else, that, NHL hockey talk, we be forced to burn to the ground.Kath wrote: Wrong again. Thanks for playing, "What is Kath thinking, now?"
Continue with this nonsensical Montylympics rule, and you invite the insurgency by your own hand.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Tue Feb 06, 2018 3:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Tell that to Kath, she is the one threatening to delete posts in the Olympics Safe Space if it goes off topic. It is silly, we are calling her out on it. Try to keep up.pineapplemike wrote: all this talk about censorship and free speech is just silly
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
If she was going to enforce the rules consistently, then she would censor me when I call her a child fucker, like she censored clubgop when he did the same to monte, but she won't. It's all about the feelz, she doesn't know how to be consistent with enforcement.Smitty-48 wrote:I don't believe I'm being a dick, I'm quite prepared to abide by your rule, if you enforce it consistently, let me know when you are prepared to be logically consistent, and I'll will abide without reservation.Kath wrote:Have a party. Being a dick is your thing, I guess. It's all good.Smitty-48 wrote:
Enforce your rule for all threads, or none at all, I'll abide by a rule which is enforced consistently, but one rule for the Montylympics and no rules for anything else, that, NHL hockey talk, we be forced to burn to the ground.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
meh, u wuz trolling to troll in hopes that I'd mod you so you could faux outrage at my ridiculous behavior.
Sorry I didn't take the bait. Try harder. Watch some MMA, that should get you hard.
Sorry I didn't take the bait. Try harder. Watch some MMA, that should get you hard.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Instead you took my bait and prove you never enforce the rules consistently, way to not fall for my tricks Child Fucking Censorship Cunt.Kath wrote:meh, u wuz trolling to troll in hopes that I'd mod you so you could faux outrage at my ridiculous behavior.
Sorry I didn't take the bait. Try harder. Watch some MMA, that should get you hard.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Poor thing - did that 13 year old in the cute Catholic school uniform turn you down?
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
NHL hockey talk is quite prepared to restrict itself to an NHL hockey talk thread, when all threads are consistently under the same rule, so long as the no off topic bullshit rule is only being enforced for Monty and the Olympics, NHL hockey talk is prepared to burn all the threads down, no peace, without justice.
Nec Aspera Terrent