Nobody dislikes the prequels because of the setting, if that's what you're implying. They're horrible pieces of cinema, and completely out of sync with the rest of the series.Hwen Hoshino wrote:You think it does not make a profit if it's not in the OT era?Penner wrote:You have your speculation but this was the film that people have already fallen in love with it, even though you may have a problem with it. Personally, I don't but I do know that it hit the same beats as ANH, but then again, I feel that the Prequels were so bad that they had to do something safe like this if they want to continue making Star Wars.Hwen Hoshino wrote: I have more faith in my speculation.
Best Films of 2016/2017
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
There is so much wrong with the Prequels I honestly just can't type them all here but here is a video that you all should like:GrumpyCatFace wrote:Nobody dislikes the prequels because of the setting, if that's what you're implying. They're horrible pieces of cinema, and completely out of sync with the rest of the series.Hwen Hoshino wrote:You think it does not make a profit if it's not in the OT era?Penner wrote:
You have your speculation but this was the film that people have already fallen in love with it, even though you may have a problem with it. Personally, I don't but I do know that it hit the same beats as ANH, but then again, I feel that the Prequels were so bad that they had to do something safe like this if they want to continue making Star Wars.
-
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
No i just mean that if Harrison and co were dead and they would pick a new era it would still make a profit.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Nobody dislikes the prequels because of the setting, if that's what you're implying. They're horrible pieces of cinema, and completely out of sync with the rest of the series.Hwen Hoshino wrote:You think it does not make a profit if it's not in the OT era?Penner wrote:
You have your speculation but this was the film that people have already fallen in love with it, even though you may have a problem with it. Personally, I don't but I do know that it hit the same beats as ANH, but then again, I feel that the Prequels were so bad that they had to do something safe like this if they want to continue making Star Wars.
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
Possibly. But I think it was critical for the series to link back up to the OT. This was a very public 'apology' for the prequel shitshow, and necessary to hit all the old notes, in order to bring the old fanbase back in. The next few movies might break the formula - and I hope they do - but this was absolutely what they needed to do, or fans would walk en masse.Hwen Hoshino wrote:No i just mean that if Harrison and co were dead and they would pick a new era it would still make a profit.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Nobody dislikes the prequels because of the setting, if that's what you're implying. They're horrible pieces of cinema, and completely out of sync with the rest of the series.Hwen Hoshino wrote: You think it does not make a profit if it's not in the OT era?
-
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
Luke will have a Huge part in VIII and perhaps a lesser one in IX. After that none of the originals will be back, not even R2D2 or C3POGrumpyCatFace wrote:Possibly. But I think it was critical for the series to link back up to the OT. This was a very public 'apology' for the prequel shitshow, and necessary to hit all the old notes, in order to bring the old fanbase back in. The next few movies might break the formula - and I hope they do - but this was absolutely what they needed to do, or fans would walk en masse.Hwen Hoshino wrote:No i just mean that if Harrison and co were dead and they would pick a new era it would still make a profit.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Nobody dislikes the prequels because of the setting, if that's what you're implying. They're horrible pieces of cinema, and completely out of sync with the rest of the series.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
They know what the fuck a lightsaber is and it's the number 1 global brand, they would have came back. They just played it ubersafe.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Possibly. But I think it was critical for the series to link back up to the OT. This was a very public 'apology' for the prequel shitshow, and necessary to hit all the old notes, in order to bring the old fanbase back in. The next few movies might break the formula - and I hope they do - but this was absolutely what they needed to do, or fans would walk en masse.Hwen Hoshino wrote:No i just mean that if Harrison and co were dead and they would pick a new era it would still make a profit.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Nobody dislikes the prequels because of the setting, if that's what you're implying. They're horrible pieces of cinema, and completely out of sync with the rest of the series.
If they could milk it, they would milk it.SilverEagle wrote: Luke will have a Huge part in VIII and perhaps a lesser one in IX. After that none of the originals will be back, not even R2D2 or C3PO
-
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
It makes sense for them to use the OT's heroes right now. Luke's arc is almost complete and when it is he will not longer be used in future movies. I'm guessing he survives IX but when Disney decides to to X, XI, and XII there will be a large time gap between IX and X. Luke will have died and at the most will be a force ghost but I doubt that.Hwen Hoshino wrote:They know what the fuck a lightsaber is and it's the number 1 global brand, they would have came back. They just played it ubersafe.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Possibly. But I think it was critical for the series to link back up to the OT. This was a very public 'apology' for the prequel shitshow, and necessary to hit all the old notes, in order to bring the old fanbase back in. The next few movies might break the formula - and I hope they do - but this was absolutely what they needed to do, or fans would walk en masse.Hwen Hoshino wrote: No i just mean that if Harrison and co were dead and they would pick a new era it would still make a profit.
If they could milk it, they would milk it.SilverEagle wrote: Luke will have a Huge part in VIII and perhaps a lesser one in IX. After that none of the originals will be back, not even R2D2 or C3PO
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
- Location: Canadastan
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
Anyone watch Logan?
It wasn't bad... but I've heard folks raving about it... I think it tried to be more than "just" a comic book movie and kind of half accomplished what it set out to...
Sometimes good... plenty of cringey.
It wasn't bad... but I've heard folks raving about it... I think it tried to be more than "just" a comic book movie and kind of half accomplished what it set out to...
Sometimes good... plenty of cringey.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty
-
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
Haven't seen it yet but I'm planning to soon.DrYouth wrote:Anyone watch Logan?
It wasn't bad... but I've heard folks raving about it... I think it tried to be more than "just" a comic book movie and kind of half accomplished what it set out to...
Sometimes good... plenty of cringey.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: Best Films of 2016/2017
I have seen and I think it's a good movie. I mean it's not close to the really great movies, but still, it's a good movie and it's also Hugh Jackman's swan song to the X-Men franchised. What I liked, and what others liked, was that it only focused on 3 main characters and then it becomes a road trip-western-esque movie (yes, the movie borrows a lot of its imagery and themes from Westerns, like Shane).DrYouth wrote:Anyone watch Logan?
It wasn't bad... but I've heard folks raving about it... I think it tried to be more than "just" a comic book movie and kind of half accomplished what it set out to...
Sometimes good... plenty of cringey.