Waiting for DBTrek...
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
Notice how in the post where Hash is apparently blowing Speaker to Animals' cover, according to StA anyway, Hash actually references an earlier event that actually blew StA's cover, if his cover wasn't blown prior to that. StA's own evidence contradicts his own narrative, yet he acts incredulous that we don't see things his way.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
StCapps wrote:Okay there omnipotent mind reader, I'm sure you can be 100% sure that I didn't know until after.Speaker to Animals wrote:LOL, no you didn't.
Anything to maintain the delusion that you were stealthy until Hash burned your cover. You need to pretend that nothing else prior could have possibly given you away and you're unwilling to accept the possibility that you didn't cover your tracks all that well. As if that scenario isn't a far more likely possibility than your "it's all Hash's fault" narrative.
There is absolutely no evidence that you knew. Only Monty suspected it.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.Speaker to Animals wrote:There is absolutely no evidence that you knew. Only Monty suspected it.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
StCapps wrote:Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.Speaker to Animals wrote:There is absolutely no evidence that you knew. Only Monty suspected it.
LOL, okay sparky. Whatever.
The fact remains, the only person who actually presented evidence that they suspected it was Monty.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
True but that doesn't mean you weren't subtle and hadn't given yourself away prior to the 8th. It just means there is no documented proof yet presented that this is the case. If you want to choose to believe that you were so stealthy that no one could have possibly suspected before that point, then it's your prerogative to believe in a far less likely narrative, but that is hardly clear logical thinking.Speaker to Animals wrote:The fact remains, the only person who actually presented evidence that they suspected it was Monty.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
I'm glad I was included in the PM, otherwise I would still be in the dark
Cmon man, at least wear the avatar
Cmon man, at least wear the avatar
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
Don't talk about Fight Club.pineapplemike wrote:I'm glad I was included in the PM, otherwise I would still be in the dark
Cmon man, at least wear the avatar
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
Who the fucks calls themselves "skankhunt"? In the first place?StCapps wrote:Still a better guess than skankhunt lulz.TheReal_ND wrote:That's not DB
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
It's a great name and callsign.
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: Waiting for DBTrek...
I actually missed this one:pineapplemike wrote:I'm glad I was included in the PM, otherwise I would still be in the dark
Cmon man, at least wear the avatar
It's so fitting for DSL...