-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:36 pm
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Oh, make no mistake. I live the life of a dutiful monk, and have for years now. Family uber alles, and such. My karma is strong.
Whatever you think my life is, you're probably wrong. I serve those around me, I just don't see any larger "purpose" to existence.
Even that can bring you unhappiness. Your family can be taken away from you. Then what? That's how a lot of men end up eating buckshot in the garage.
That is exactly the only thing that would make me eat buckshot.
That, and the final stages of a gruesome terminal illness.
Bare minimum, I would argue that your purpose in life ought not be something that can be stripped from you by a vengeful woman and a wicked court system. That's setting yourself up for disaster. Been there. Done that. Mistake.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:37 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:
Even that can bring you unhappiness. Your family can be taken away from you. Then what? That's how a lot of men end up eating buckshot in the garage.
That is exactly the only thing that would make me eat buckshot.
That, and the final stages of a gruesome terminal illness.
Bare minimum, I would argue that your purpose in life ought not be something that can be stripped from you by a vengeful woman and a wicked court system. That's setting yourself up for disaster. Been there. Done that. Mistake.
Well, such is the duty of a father.
I was picturing more of a car accident scenario though, not simply 'living apart' from them. That would hurt, and probably ruin the remainder of my life, but I'd still feel a duty to support and guide the kids.
-
Smitty-48
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Post
by Smitty-48 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:37 pm
apeman wrote:Since I shed my nihilistic beliefs, and I swear to you this is true, I have drawn so many more people towards me that it looks like magic.
Easy to make fun of me here, but now that I act like everything I do matters, really matters, it has changed my life for the best.
My life has never been so full.
Not kidding.
I put myself out here and its easy to make fun of me, but I do it because it's true, and maybe it makes a difference to you
Well bully for you, but why do you think that makes you more likely to do your duty than I? I can be a nihlistic hedonist and still recognize that since Her Majesty defends the right, thus I must defend Her Majesty, in order to retain my autonomy from the mobs of Church Ladies and Commies.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
Kazmyr
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am
Post
by Kazmyr » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:39 pm
It's spreading:
John Henry Says Red Sox Want to Change Yawkey Way Name Due to Racist Legacy
Yawkey owned the Red Sox from 1933 until his death in 1976. During his time as owner, they were the last Major League Baseball team to integrate in 1959.
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:40 pm
They can go fuck themselves.
#NotOneRedCent
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:45 pm
The Conservative wrote:
They can go fuck themselves.
Don't worry. The wave of Stupid is peaking.
-
Kazmyr
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am
Post
by Kazmyr » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:45 pm
The Conservative wrote:
They can go fuck themselves.
Maaaahty's got a full roll of Lifesavers in his shorts over this one.
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:49 pm
Kazmyr wrote:The Conservative wrote:
They can go fuck themselves.
Maaaahty's got a full roll of Lifesavers in his shorts over this one.
LMFAO
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:50 pm
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
That is exactly the only thing that would make me eat buckshot.
That, and the final stages of a gruesome terminal illness.
Bare minimum, I would argue that your purpose in life ought not be something that can be stripped from you by a vengeful woman and a wicked court system. That's setting yourself up for disaster. Been there. Done that. Mistake.
Well, such is the duty of a father.
I was picturing more of a car accident scenario though, not simply 'living apart' from them. That would hurt, and probably ruin the remainder of my life, but I'd still feel a duty to support and guide the kids.
Duty and purpose are two different things. When you conflate the two, that's when you see men cutting their lives short when their wive's decide to look for a different man and take everything. It's also what happens when totalitarian states muster million-man armies and lead countless souls to the slaughter. Their purpose and their duty is one and the same.
I would caution you against such an assumption. It leads not only to ruin but a lack of virtue.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:53 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:
Bare minimum, I would argue that your purpose in life ought not be something that can be stripped from you by a vengeful woman and a wicked court system. That's setting yourself up for disaster. Been there. Done that. Mistake.
Well, such is the duty of a father.
I was picturing more of a car accident scenario though, not simply 'living apart' from them. That would hurt, and probably ruin the remainder of my life, but I'd still feel a duty to support and guide the kids.
Duty and purpose are two different things. When you conflate the two, that's when you see men cutting their lives short when their wive's decide to look for a different man and take everything. It's also what happens when totalitarian states muster million-man armies and lead countless souls to the slaughter. Their purpose and their duty is one and the same.
I would caution you against such an assumption. It leads not only to ruin but a lack of virtue.
No woman could take my kids away from me, only make me live somewhere else. They'll always be my kids. And really, that would have a lot of upsides lol.