GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Perhaps this is an issue of definitions. Hedonism, I believe, invokes a complete selfishness, with no regard for anyone else - sociopathy.
Precisely for the reason you give below - you'll be punished for it. Not only by the State, which would be a last resort, but your own conscience. The human mind does not like to see itself as an abuser.
My point being, the punishment comes after the act. State punishment, while punitive, is also a deterrent. Nihilism removes the deterrent effect.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Nihilism, by its very nature, precludes any sort of "for all" ideology. Believe what you want, no concern of mine. But as a human, I feel that I have a duty to help maximize the happiness of my fellow man, so I would strongly advocate at least sharing the idea.
That presumes that everyone will react similarly to nihilism. You already exhibit the orientation towards a purpose (this duty, why?), but what of others? Nihilism lets everyone drift about wherever they may, no orientation; no boundaries. Nihilism is already depressing as shit. Giving someone a depressing ideology and telling them to be happy about it... yeah, that's not working out as well as you think it's going to.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Indeed. I have no qualms with anyone believing in any sort of mystical thing. I have a real problem with those that attempt constantly, throughout our history, to impose their belief on others.
My beef is not with God. It's with religion.
Above you said "you have a duty to help maximize the happiness of my fellow man." It's the same idea as someone of a particular faith preaching a religion to convert those who are not of the faith, in an attempt to save them. By bringing them into the religion, they may sacrifice to find ultimate happiness. This isn't to say that religion hasn't ever been used for nefarious ends; happens all the time. Sorting out the genuine benevolent belief from the false, malevolent ones? A bit tougher of a proposition.