Coronavirus thread
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
I'm so glad Sweden tried herd immunity.
Swedish doctor on C19
https://sebastianrushworth.com/2020/08/ ... rspective/
Swedish doctor on C19
https://sebastianrushworth.com/2020/08/ ... rspective/
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
Heres a podcast I check now and again. This was a good episode
Lessons From the CoVid Pandemic
http://www.thesurvivalpodcast.com/sauce ... d-pandemic
A good look at CoVid, and more importantly the response to C19 by governments and individuals.
Lessons From the CoVid Pandemic
http://www.thesurvivalpodcast.com/sauce ... d-pandemic
A good look at CoVid, and more importantly the response to C19 by governments and individuals.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
Fuck you... six feet may not be enough, I'm done with this shit.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covi ... orbidities
Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death. The number of deaths with each condition or cause is shown for all deaths and by age groups. For data on comorbidities,
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: Coronavirus thread
Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
The usual diagnostic tests may simply be too sensitive and too slow to contain the spread of the virus.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/heal ... sting.html
Some of the nation’s leading public health experts are raising a new concern in the endless debate over coronavirus testing in the United States: The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus.
Most of these people are not likely to be contagious, and identifying them may contribute to bottlenecks that prevent those who are contagious from being found in time. But researchers say the solution is not to test less, or to skip testing people without symptoms, as recently suggested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Instead, new data underscore the need for more widespread use of rapid tests, even if they are less sensitive.
“The decision not to test asymptomatic people is just really backward,” said Dr. Michael Mina, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, referring to the C.D.C. recommendation.
“In fact, we should be ramping up testing of all different people,” he said, “but we have to do it through whole different mechanisms.”
In what may be a step in this direction, the Trump administration announced on Thursday that it would purchase 150 million rapid tests.
The most widely used diagnostic test for the new coronavirus, called a PCR test, provides a simple yes-no answer to the question of whether a patient is infected.
But similar PCR tests for other viruses do offer some sense of how contagious an infected patient may be: The results may include a rough estimate of the amount of virus in the patient’s body.
“We’ve been using one type of data for everything, and that is just plus or minus — that’s all,” Dr. Mina said. “We’re using that for clinical diagnostics, for public health, for policy decision-making.”
But yes-no isn’t good enough, he added. It’s the amount of virus that should dictate the infected patient’s next steps. “It’s really irresponsible, I think, to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative issue,” Dr. Mina said.
The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious.
This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are.
In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.
On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.
One solution would be to adjust the cycle threshold used now to decide that a patient is infected. Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus.
Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said.
Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said.
A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less. Those changes would mean the amount of genetic material in a patient’s sample would have to be 100-fold to 1,000-fold that of the current standard for the test to return a positive result — at least, one worth acting on.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
-
- Posts: 4150
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
I wasn't sure if this goes here in the WuFlu thread or the Civil war one. These tyrannical liberal officials.....
https://freebeacon.com/coronavirus/coun ... trictions/A California church challenged local coronavirus restrictions on worship services, and county authorities responded by canceling the church's five-decade-old lease.
County officials informed Grace Community Church that it will terminate its decades-old lease on a parking lot after the church filed a lawsuit over local restrictions against in-person worship. The county told the church in a letter it intends to terminate the lease of a large section of the parking lot that the church leases, threatening to forcibly remove any of the church's property that remained in the lot.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
It's California, does this really amaze anyone?Haumana wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:35 amI wasn't sure if this goes here in the WuFlu thread or the Civil war one. These tyrannical liberal officials.....
https://freebeacon.com/coronavirus/coun ... trictions/A California church challenged local coronavirus restrictions on worship services, and county authorities responded by canceling the church's five-decade-old lease.
County officials informed Grace Community Church that it will terminate its decades-old lease on a parking lot after the church filed a lawsuit over local restrictions against in-person worship. The county told the church in a letter it intends to terminate the lease of a large section of the parking lot that the church leases, threatening to forcibly remove any of the church's property that remained in the lot.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
CDC Status = CANCELED
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
#NotOneRedCent