THE ERA OF TRUMP

[StCapps]

Put the fake news hash pipe down, Smitty.

The only way to think that this book rings true, is to think the Democrat Talking Points ring true. If you think it's believable, it's because you are drinking Democrat kool-aid. When did Smitty start drinking the DNC kool-aid?

[Okeefenokee]

Oh good, here's Capps to Trumpsplain how this is all going to play to the dumb masses.

Nearly everyone mentioned in this book has stated that it's horseshit. You're a fucking moron for believing this shit.

This country needs voter requirements or this show is over.

[Okeefenokee]

Who honestly believes the word of a former employee who was jilted that publicly when they were fired? A writer who wants a better story than reality, for sure, but the why the rest of you don't take this with a massive grain of salt is beyond me, especially when the writer seems to be backing up the CNN anti-Trump narrative at every turn.

And a writer who states at the outset that nothing in the book is verified.

[Smitty-48]

He wrote that Trump doesn't know who Boehner is.

No, he wrote that Bannon said that Trump didn't know who Boehner was at first, early on when he first got to the WH.

[Okeefenokee]

Bannon was the secret power behind the throne because Trump is semi-illiterate and let him run everything and now that Bannon gone, it's Chaos! Chaos! Chaos! because Bannon was the only one holding Trump in check.
Yeah, whatever, if you believe that.....

Obvious bullshit is obvious, turn on your bullshit detector for half a second, it should be going wild.

They are forgetting that the most productive period of the presidency came after Bannon left. There were almost no wins until Bannon left.

Bannon's travel ban failed. The travel ban that Bannon didn't touch passed.

Gorusch didn't come from Bannon.

Tax bill came after Bannon.

Moving the embassy came after Bannon.

[StCapps]

Who honestly believes the word of a former employee who was jilted that publicly when they were fired? A writer who wants a better story than reality, for sure, but the why the rest of you don't take this with a massive grain of salt is beyond me, especially when the writer seems to be backing up the CNN anti-Trump narrative at every turn.

And a writer who states at the outset that nothing in the book is verified.

Michael Wolff is Scott Templeton.

[Okeefenokee]

He wrote that Trump doesn't know who Boehner is.

No, he wrote that Bannon said that Trump didn't know who Boehner was at first, early on when he first got to the WH.

Which is clearly horseshit. If you're believing this shit you should be embarrassed.

[Smitty-48]

He wrote that Trump doesn't know who Boehner is.

No, he wrote that Bannon said that Trump didn't know who Boehner was at first, early on when he first got to the WH.

Which is clearly horseshit. If you're believing this shit you should be embarrassed.

Says who? The MHFtards? lol

Take a lap, cornpone.

[StCapps]

If anyone should take a lap in this thread, it's Smitty, believing Scott Templeton because he waved a notebook in his face that had not a word in it, clown show. Michael Wolff should be taken with a massive grain of salt, he lifted his book from CNN bullshit that somehow rings to true to Smitty. He must have broken his bullshit detector, or turned it off.

[Okeefenokee]

You're welcome to your opinion, but who even asked you for it? I didn't ask you what you believed, I said the book rings tru, what's it to you?

The book rings like a CNN news report, and you are eating it up. Get better.

Well, it's not like CNN is outright lying, CNN is biased, but I don't think they deliberately lie, CNN doesn't make shit up, they just pick and choose what they emphasize.

...CNN doesn't lie.

dude's lost his mind.