The internet takeover thread

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:08 pm

Okeefenokee wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:05 pm
Your government has been covering them up for decades. You have no idea how many there are.

Your government is still covering them up by arresting people for reporting on the trials, and barring the press from reporting on the arrest.

If I say they are in every city, you have no grounds at all to dispute it.
...now replace “government” with “church”.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Fife » Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:15 pm

Paging Dr. Tu quoque.

Weak tits.

Image

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:17 pm

Bullshit Okie Donkey.
No one has been arrested for reporting on Muslim rape cases.
One arsehole was arrested for contempt of court. Twice.
The restrictions on reporting were put in place so as not to predjudice the jury for a later trail connected to the same offense.

This has all been explained to you before but you only hear what you want to hear.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:26 pm

"No one has been arrested for reporting on Muslim rape cases."

:clap: :clap: :clap:

We should change the title under your forum name to Limey Pravda.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Okeefenokee » Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:41 pm

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:08 pm
Okeefenokee wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:05 pm
Your government has been covering them up for decades. You have no idea how many there are.

Your government is still covering them up by arresting people for reporting on the trials, and barring the press from reporting on the arrest.

If I say they are in every city, you have no grounds at all to dispute it.
...now replace “government” with “church”.
I'm not catholic.

Catholic police haven't arrested anyone.

derp
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:45 pm

Yeah I'm not going back to the Steven Yaxley Lennon argument with you guys. You keep repeating your lies in the hope that eventually you will be believed

Joseph G would be proud of you and Yaxley Lennon.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Okeefenokee » Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:58 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 2:17 pm
Bullshit Okie Donkey.
No one has been arrested for reporting on Muslim rape cases.
One arsehole was arrested for contempt of court. Twice.
The restrictions on reporting were put in place so as not to predjudice the jury for a later trail connected to the same offense.

This has all been explained to you before but you only hear what you want to hear.
Yes, he was arrested for reporting on a muslim rape trial. He was standing outside on a public street reporting on the trial inside. Your government arrested him for it, and sentenced him to prison in a kangaroo court where he wasn't allowed to have his own lawyer.

Another judge then threw out the conviction, because the original judge wouldn't tell him exactly what he'd done, so he had no way to defend himself.

The restrictions on reporting were put in place to keep the rest of the world from finding out what your fucked up country is doing, which is why any other trial in your country is swarming with reporters who aren't arrested, strange that.

Sad that you're still defending this authoritarian shit show of a government you have when the conviction was already thrown out with the specific explanation that what occurred was not justice.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Aug 09, 2018 3:06 pm

Yaxley Lennon will face a retrial for the offence of contempt of court. Only the procedure was dismissed not the offence. His first conviction for contempt was upheld.
Don't let me stop you repeating your lies though , some blinkered fool is bound to believe you eventually...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Okeefenokee » Thu Aug 09, 2018 3:42 pm

His conviction was thrown out because the judge would not tell him what he had done.

Because he didn't know what he did, he couldn't defend himself.

Right before he was arrested he was told by police that he was allowed to film from the sidewalk, which is on video.

The judge also wouldn't allow him to have his lawyer.

The judge appointed one who told him to plead guilty because there was no way he could defend himself when the judge wouldn't tell him what he did.

The judge still has not said what specifically it was that he did that was illegal, because the judge never watched his stream.

If your case against him was so fucking rock solid, he wouldn't be at home with his family right now.

As always, you're a liar.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by C-Mag » Thu Aug 09, 2018 3:44 pm

Microsoft is threatening to take Gab down due to Hate Speech.

We could go at any time.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience