A watchkeeper certification is a little more like; can you fly the helicopter, as opposed to just; can you jump out of it.Viktorthepirate wrote:Interesting article.C-Mag wrote:Investigation found that ships had not completed their training and weren’t certified by the U.S. Navy to conduct “mobility seamanship,” or basic steering of the ship, according to U.S. Navy records provided to two House Armed Services subcommittees.
However, all crews were found to be 100 % on all Transgender, SHARPS and EEO Training. Families will be able to lay their Sailors to rest easily knowing they had taken all transgender and sexuality training to the best of their ability.
Scathing Article on the readiness of the US Navy
http://usdefensewatch.com/2017/09/the-n ... l-cluster/
I do wonder how much of those certs are bullshit or really required.
I wasn't "qualified" for air assault but I air assaulted for several missions nonetheless.
Not trying to cover for them, just saying sometimes those "certifications" are just some official training for a job you do every day anyways.
Rest of the article was interesting. I don't know tailhook well but from what I read it was bullshit.
If you're going on the air assault and I tell you; neither of these pilots is qualified to fly the bird, are you still getting on? Me, I'm saying this bird is out of action until they can find a crew who is qualified to fly it, and I would be perfectly within my authority, don't care if it's the CinC herself ordering me to board my troops.
Whoever is standing watch, has the conn, they are "flying" the ship, and it's a 7,000 ton ship, with 250 sailors aboard.