-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Post
by C-Mag » Fri Dec 29, 2017 1:03 pm
Happy New Year ........................... You're Fired
A little Swamp Draining going on.
Trump Just Abruptly Fired All 16 Members, Many Obama Appointees, on HIV/AIDS Council
"I can only speculate,” said Gabriel Maldonado, a remaining member of PACHA. “Like any administration, they want their own people there. Many of us were Obama appointees. I was an Obama appointee and my term was continuing until 2018.”
The Obama administration cleared house of George W. Bush's appointees much like President Trump appears to be doing, Newsweek notes.
https://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/12 ... il-report/
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Post
by StCapps » Fri Dec 29, 2017 1:31 pm
DBTrek wrote:Trump to Dems: No ‘dreamer’ deal without border wall
President Trump on Friday demanded that Democrats approve funding for his signature Mexican border wall before he supports a program designed to protect immigrants brought into the US illegally as minors.
“The Democrats have been told, and fully understand, that there can be no DACA without the desperately needed WALL at the Southern Border and an END to the horrible Chain Migration & ridiculous Lottery System of Immigration etc.,” he said in a morning tweet.
“We must protect our Country at all cost!”
DACA refers to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which protected almost 800,000 youngsters — known as “Dreamers” — brought into the US illegally by their parents.
In September, the Trump administration announced it would end the Obama-era program after March 1 unless Congress finalizes a deal on the issue and approves new border enforcement measures. . . .
https://nypost.com/2017/12/29/trump-to- ... rder-wall/
Are Dems going to deal, o see if screaming "racist" x 20000 proves more effective this time than it has the last ten thousand times?
Remember when I told you Trump was going to make a deal on The Wall for DACA, Capps is right again.
*yip*
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:02 pm
It looks like he's asking for the whole immigration reform package. There won't be any amnesty for DACA.
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Post
by StCapps » Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:04 pm
TheReal_ND wrote:There won't be any amnesty for DACA.
The Wall for keeping DACA, just watch him.
*yip*
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:08 pm
He's asking for an end to chain migration and then lottery quotas. They won't make a deal on those terms. Hopefully he doesn't settle for something.
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Post
by StCapps » Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:11 pm
TheReal_ND wrote:He's asking for an end to chain migration and then lottery quotas. They won't make a deal on those terms. Hopefully he doesn't settle for something.
If he gets his wall, he'll give the Dems DACA, he'll settle.
*yip*
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:16 pm
Frankly if he gets an end to chain migration and lottery quotas for DACA amnesty I'm not even sure where I stand on that. That would likely be a good deal.
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:45 pm
lol
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri Dec 29, 2017 4:06 pm
Huh?
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Dec 29, 2017 4:27 pm
kybkh wrote:We all see what we want I guess.
You guys see the guy as he is portrayed by the media as an orange cheeto looking bumbling idiot.
I see a guy who just won the most improbable election victory imaginable.
You may say that those things can be mutually exclusive but you should try considering the fact that they can't be.
They’re not mutually exclusive.