There are plenty of reasons that a politician might say something that sounds stupid to Kath, without the reason they said that thing being because they are stupid. So why do you keep going after Trump for saying things that help him on Twitter, all the damn time, as if the only explanation is that he's dumb? Maybe he doesn't care that you think it's stupid, because it's effective regardless of your opinion, ever stop to think of that?Kath wrote:Again, all you have to do is quote me saying that I said the tweets would hurt him. Seriously, just one quote.
About a year ago I predicted he would not give up Twitter, that he shouldn't have to and that he would likely be saying some truly moronic things.
I'm here waiting for you to quote me saying I thought the tweets would hurt him.
No, the answer has to be Trump is stupid, Kath says so. Even though it's easy to see how Trump benefits from what Kath considers to be a stupid remark, lulz, he must have said it only because he's dumb. Any political gain is merely coincidental, he couldn't have done it intentionally, he's too stupid to do that.