Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:49 am

What passes for rational thought process with many Americans:

This poor woman was almost raped thirty-five years ago in some place, some time, even though no one named as a witness will corroborate the claim. THE FBI MUST INVESTIGATE AT ONCE!!!


Ok.
What should the FBI investigate first? The unknown time, the unknown place, or question the witnesses who have already stated they know nothing about any of this? Where should the FBI begin, do tell.
:doh:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18667
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:51 am

It's not "what" it's "how long." To even begin an investigation is to start a Mueller-probe.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:56 am

Confirm him and then have the FBI investigate. It's not like there is a statue of limitations on it. Also, they will finally arrest and charge this bitch for lying if they have to get involved.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:57 am

DBTrek wrote:
Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:49 am
What passes for rational thought process with many Americans:

This poor woman was almost raped thirty-five years ago in some place, some time, even though no one named as a witness will corroborate the claim. THE FBI MUST INVESTIGATE AT ONCE!!!


Ok.
What should the FBI investigate first? The unknown time, the unknown place, or question the witnesses who have already stated they know nothing about any of this? Where should the FBI begin, do tell.
:doh:
If they do this, can we get Clinton on the stand again, please?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:57 am

Martin Hash wrote:
Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:51 am
It's not "what" it's "how long." To even begin an investigation is to start a Mueller-probe.
I’m just waiting for some grown up in the senate to ask which part of the story the FBI should begin investigating. Demand a specific starting point.

Force them to recognize that there is nothing to be investigated, as no hard details exist and no witnesses can testify to the veracity of the story. The FBI can investigate nothing.

It’s like if I accused you of pulling a knife on me and taking my lunch money thirty years ago, maybe during the summer or fall, but no one else saw it.

What the fuck is there to investigate?

Nada.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:59 am

They would investigate your claims in order to prove you lied and made a false police report. Then they would arrest you.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:01 pm

People in my area are really fucking pissed right now at the democrats. More so than usual. Are you guys noticing a similar trend?

It kind of feels like they snapped something in the American psyche yesterday.

Also, my feminist neighbor isn't coming at me. I think she knows this was a farce and is just checking out of politics again. On the one hand, I see the lugenpresse running with fake outrage and righteous indignation from the wamen, but I just don't see that where I live, and it's kind of an interesting borderland between batshit liberalism and Trump Nation.

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:07 pm

DBTrek wrote:
Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:49 am
What should the FBI investigate first? The unknown time, the unknown place, or question the witnesses who have already stated they know nothing about any of this? Where should the FBI begin, do tell.
:doh:
They should start by investigating the credibility of the accuser. But that would be mean, so it won't happen.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek » Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:09 pm

No.

Seattle is crazy as fuck, as always. Here’s a popular meme people in my area are throwing on their on social media pages:
Image
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18667
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:12 pm

An investigation would be a Dem win. As proven by Mueller, “investigations” can last forever. Ignore Flake, assume his “no” vote and rely on Pence.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change