Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
LOL, get him girls
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
It's bombards body language.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:26 amResistBunny92.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:23 amWho is the body language expert giving her diagnosis? I'm not dissing what she is saying, but opinion vs fact are things we need to be careful of.
Seriously, I'd like to know that too. Could be an actual professional or just a YouTube wanna be star.
She does state that reading body language would is more of an art than a scientist. She has done lots of videos. Take a look and you judge if she's credible. IMO she gets far more right than wrong.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Democrat playbook 101: When you can't get your way, have a tantrum and walk out.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408 ... in-protest
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408 ... in-protest
I can picture her stomping her feet like a 2 year-old while saying this.I strongly object. This is just totally ridiculous. What a railroad job. My answer is no, no, no!” Hirono yelled out shortly before leaving the room.
She didn't deny a conspiracy.Hirono said Kavanaugh’s opening statement was too partisan to be a Supreme Court justice.
“I have never heard a Supreme Court justice come out and say there is a vast left-wing conspiracy to undermine his nomination,” she said.
-
- Posts: 14791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
It just seems to me that she dresses her observations up with an opinion, instead of stating what she sees, and how a professional would translate it...C-Mag wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:31 amIt's bombards body language.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:26 amResistBunny92.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:23 amWho is the body language expert giving her diagnosis? I'm not dissing what she is saying, but opinion vs fact are things we need to be careful of.
Seriously, I'd like to know that too. Could be an actual professional or just a YouTube wanna be star.
She does state that reading body language would is more of an art than a scientist. She has done lots of videos. Take a look and you judge if she's credible. IMO she gets far more right than wrong.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You mean like refusing to hold confirmations hearings for the SCOTUS appointee of a duly elected president for more than a year? That's was what half the country was thinking about when Graham was crying his croc tears and bleating about this being the worst thing he's ever seen.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Sure, we might see some asymmetrical attacks from the fringes of both sides. I’m talking about D vs. R open shooting civil war. That ain’t happening. Not with these lazy fuckers. Even their mob violence peters out when the other side punches them in the face.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:22 amAs a kid growing up in the late 1960s and early 70s, who wrote papers on the SLA, Weather Underground, etc., it doesn't take many true believers to start a fucking shitstorm, especially if half the nation is willing to let them hide out in their basements, get materials to make explosives, and the like. IMGAY421 can get all the ingredients to Simtex from the drug store to hand off to his Antifa buddies.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
- Posts: 18725
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
That was pure political maneuvering, though it was reprehensible.brewster wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:34 amYou mean like refusing to hold confirmations hearings for the SCOTUS appointee of a duly elected president for more than a year? That's was what half the country was thinking about when Graham was crying his croc tears and bleating about this being the worst thing he's ever seen.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Let's not forget Ted CRUZ'S opponent this fall. Man is a convicted hit and run drunk driver who Democrats want on the Senate but pearl clutch over beer. Who can get "blackout" drunk from beer? A 90 pound 17 year old girl?Ph64 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:31 amLuckily I bought a bottle of vodka at the store the other day, so obviously I can't be a drunken rapist. Only beer does that.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:34 pmBeer Pong on a weekday? Were you President of the gang rape club in HS? What does your yearbook say?Ph64 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:56 pm
Are you sure you didn't black out 36 years ago and get one of those pong balls in the wrong place??
Someone says you did, somewhere - though they don't remember where, sometime - they can't recall when though, they're not sure how they got there or home - wherever there was, and there were "witnesses" - though all of them deny it ever happened. You must be guilty though, you damn blackout drinker you.