Net Neutrality
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
Would have been nice if lolbergs and neocohens had not criminalized municipal wifi to protect Comcast, but whatever. Honk honk, shekel worshippers.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Net Neutrality
LOLLLL.
Without muh federal government, who will build muh internetz???
Ask your postal carrier today how many Mbps you should expect for your NEWS.US.FREEDOM stream.
.... Better yet, I'd like to hear someone at the next "debate" ask Fauxcahontas if her plan includes outlawing all private development of LEO internet satellites.
If you can calm your tits for about half a second before handing our entire infrastructure over to the swamp, the real world outside of federal city is busting its ass to get your Netflix to you at 24/7 fatpipe speed for a competitive price.
Without muh federal government, who will build muh internetz???
Ask your postal carrier today how many Mbps you should expect for your NEWS.US.FREEDOM stream.
.... Better yet, I'd like to hear someone at the next "debate" ask Fauxcahontas if her plan includes outlawing all private development of LEO internet satellites.
If you can calm your tits for about half a second before handing our entire infrastructure over to the swamp, the real world outside of federal city is busting its ass to get your Netflix to you at 24/7 fatpipe speed for a competitive price.
Last edited by Fife on Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Net Neutrality
That would have been nice, but the answer to problem is not to give the FCC control of the internet, that is retarded.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:38 amWould have been nice if lolbergs and neocohens had not criminalized municipal wifi to protect Comcast, but whatever. Honk honk, shekel worshippers.
That's not going to get back at Comcast, that's going to saddle Comcast's competition with regulations they are less able to afford to comply with than Comcast is.
Giving the FCC control will simply further entrench the very special interests you seek to punish with your counter-productive plan.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
The FCC never had 'control of the Internet", you fucking retard.StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:43 amThat would have been nice, but the answer to problem is not to give the FCC control of the internet, that is retarded.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:38 amWould have been nice if lolbergs and neocohens had not criminalized municipal wifi to protect Comcast, but whatever. Honk honk, shekel worshippers.
That's not going to get back at Comcast, that's going to saddle Comcast's competition with regulations they are less able to afford to comply with than Comcast is.
Giving the FCC control will simply further entrench the very special interests you seek to punish with your counter-productive plan.
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Net Neutrality
Everyone should calm down and listen to the voice of reason and true consumer protection.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
Obviously, the answer is to give these tech corps, who are wiping your existence off of all social media as we speak, the power to completely shut down ip traffic to sites they do not agree with or to users they think belong othered. Because "socialism".
If you take the manifest lesson from tech censorship, smoke enough crack cocaine to confuse your ass with your mouth, and take the exact opposite course, that would be Fife on net neutrality.
If you take the manifest lesson from tech censorship, smoke enough crack cocaine to confuse your ass with your mouth, and take the exact opposite course, that would be Fife on net neutrality.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Net Neutrality
Giving the government the same power is not going to work out any better, derp.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:55 amObviously, the answer is to give these tech corps, who are wiping your existence off of all social media as we speak, the power to completely shut down ip traffic to sites they do not agree with or to users they think belong othered. Because "socialism".
If you take the manifest lesson from tech censorship, smoke enough crack cocaine to confuse your ass with your mouth, and take the exact opposite course, that would be Fife on net neutrality.
The FCC is as anti-free speech as it gets and they certainly don't stick it to entrenched special interests either, dumbest plan ever.
These are the folks you trust to enable competition in the market and protect free speech? When have they ever done that, aside from never?
You couldn't have picked a worse government agency to task with that job if you tried, your plan is a joke.
I couldn't come up with a funnier parody "save the internet" plan, that does the exact opposite, if I tried.
Take your Orwellian "Net Neutrality" and shove it up your ass, you fucking rube.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
Go ankle-bit Pineapple Mike. You are not even responding to anything I argued.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Net Neutrality
You support Obama's Net Neutrality, I am arguing against that. You act like this thread is a page long, troll.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 10:26 amGo ankle-bit Pineapple Mike. You are not even responding to anything I argued.
*yip*