If she was legitimately attacked and they cant prove in a slam dunk case that she was lying about the identity of her attacker than forget it she ain't getting charged and everyone will come away with a "oops sorry." While the crazy base will still believe the shit.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:52 pm
Women like this are a waste of human flesh and should be processed into petroleum fuel.
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
She passed on a letter to the FBI. She told nobody, and if she said it on the Senate floor she has immunity. You guys are getting flailing mad when they are ones flailing. Do not take the bait. Put him on the court and be done with it. Do not give into their kabuki theater. It's foolish.C-Mag wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 8:00 pmAgreed.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:49 pmWomen who make up allegations like this need to go to prison.
People need to stop with the"we cannot prove it" bullshit. Yes we fucking can prove it when there was never any such party, none of the alleged witnesses corroborate it, and the story keeps changing and contradicting itself. All you have to prove is that the story contains liea. Boom. Done. Can the bitches please go to prison now? Can we all agree this shit has to stop?
For fuck sake. If this happened in the context of any other crime report these women would be facing charges.
And they are all connected to Soros with democratic party a tuvist lawyers running the con?
Fucking charge them all.
We also need to bring a case against Diane Feinstein for Criminal Defamation of Character.
We have to punish these fuckers with the full weight of the court system. Pull a Mueller on them. Middle of the night tactical raid, ransack the house, forceful interrogation. Charge them for any infraction you find.
-
- Posts: 14795
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
If she went back 9 more times, she must of enjoyed something about the parties.
Perhaps being humiliated?
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14795
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Stop listening to the voices in your head...TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:41 pmI left the office after work and some stupid yankee was mouthing on and on about how he will never get the votes over the phone to some fuck head.C-Mag wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:39 pmRight now it looks like they will at least confirm Kav's, but if they don't take some kind of action to punish this bullshit i'm going to be pissed. What's my bro always say …………………….. burn it down.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:24 pm
Agreed. I'm full on accelerationist now. Let them taste the whip once the left wins back power. They will cry so hard but the few remaining people with heads on their shoulders will have already checked out, waiting for the chance to fucking send these cunts to a gas chamber after shaving their heads.
"Ok one person sure but look at all the people now!"
My cortisone levels are elevated.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14795
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
If they are false charges, I 100% agree.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:49 pmWomen who make up allegations like this need to go to prison.
People need to stop with the"we cannot prove it" bullshit. Yes we fucking can prove it when there was never any such party, none of the alleged witnesses corroborate it, and the story keeps changing and contradicting itself. All you have to prove is that the story contains lies. Boom. Done. Can the bitches please go to prison now? Can we all agree this shit has to stop?
For fuck sake. If this happened in the context of any other crime report these women would be facing charges.
And they are all connected to Soros with democratic party activist lawyers running the con?
Fucking charge them all.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
clubgop wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:38 pmOr print my account in penthouse letters.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:29 pmNo. You are a dude. If you did what she did, they'd lock your ass up.clubgop wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:32 pm
If you can prove being anywhere in the vicinity of your town mayor 36 years ago and make similar accusations and get enough concerned housewives together that mayor is fucked. You give the local rag an exclusive like that have some desperate reporter eating out the palm of your hand.
Just make sure you got that D next to your name and you'll be fine.
You'd go to jail, dude. If you just declared that the mayor sexually assaulted you sometime between 20 and 35 years ago, but you can't pin down the exact date, place, and the people you said where there all deny it ever happening, then they will put cuffs on you and charge you.
It shouldn't be any different for women.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Reality check: the problem of domestic and sexual violence today is more so a problem of female perpetrators than male perpetrators.
I mean.. duh.
https://www.studyfinds.org/boys-more-vi ... udy-finds/Who is more likely to be victimized by teen dating violence? If you’re quick to think it’s girls, new data shows you’re wrong. In a surprising twist, recently published research indicates boys are more likely to report being victims of dating violence committed by partners who hit, slap or push them.
Researchers with the University of British Columbia (UBC) and Simon Fraser University (SFU) conducted a longitudinal study of dating violence. While reports of physical abuse went down over time, they say there is a troubling gender-related trend.
Five percent of teens reported physical abuse from their dating partners in 2013, down from 6 percent in 2003. But in the last year, 5.8 percent of boys reported dating violence compared to 4.2 percent of girls.
“It could be that it’s still socially acceptable for girls to hit or slap boys in dating relationships,” says lead author Catherine Shaffer, a PhD student with SFU, in a release. “This has been found in studies of adolescents in other countries as well.”
I mean.. duh.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Both the funniest and saddest thing I've read during this whole ordeal.
I went back to a forum I long since stop posting in. It's 99% current Democrat (aka far, far left). The other 1% are Libertarian. Martin would be run out of town for being a conservative Trump loving alt-righter (he's not, but that's how his views would be received there). Anyways, one of the posters said that we need to back to 60 votes for confirmation so that the side are forced to work together. I bet if I went back through the archives I'd find posts where that same poster supported the Democrats when they changed the rules from 60 to 50 for every other nomination. Elections have consequences, remember that one?
I went back to a forum I long since stop posting in. It's 99% current Democrat (aka far, far left). The other 1% are Libertarian. Martin would be run out of town for being a conservative Trump loving alt-righter (he's not, but that's how his views would be received there). Anyways, one of the posters said that we need to back to 60 votes for confirmation so that the side are forced to work together. I bet if I went back through the archives I'd find posts where that same poster supported the Democrats when they changed the rules from 60 to 50 for every other nomination. Elections have consequences, remember that one?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
No I wouldn't. I'd be dismissed as a crank.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:43 amclubgop wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:38 pmOr print my account in penthouse letters.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:29 pm
No. You are a dude. If you did what she did, they'd lock your ass up.
Just make sure you got that D next to your name and you'll be fine.
You'd go to jail, dude. If you just declared that the mayor sexually assaulted you sometime between 20 and 35 years ago, but you can't pin down the exact date, place, and the people you said where there all deny it ever happening, then they will put cuffs on you and charge you.
It shouldn't be any different for women.