Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:17 am

TheReal_ND wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:52 pm
Image

Women like this are a waste of human flesh and should be processed into petroleum fuel.
If she was legitimately attacked and they cant prove in a slam dunk case that she was lying about the identity of her attacker than forget it she ain't getting charged and everyone will come away with a "oops sorry." While the crazy base will still believe the shit.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:23 am

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 8:00 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:49 pm
Women who make up allegations like this need to go to prison.

People need to stop with the"we cannot prove it" bullshit. Yes we fucking can prove it when there was never any such party, none of the alleged witnesses corroborate it, and the story keeps changing and contradicting itself. All you have to prove is that the story contains liea. Boom. Done. Can the bitches please go to prison now? Can we all agree this shit has to stop?

For fuck sake. If this happened in the context of any other crime report these women would be facing charges.

And they are all connected to Soros with democratic party a tuvist lawyers running the con?

Fucking charge them all.
Agreed.

We also need to bring a case against Diane Feinstein for Criminal Defamation of Character.

We have to punish these fuckers with the full weight of the court system. Pull a Mueller on them. Middle of the night tactical raid, ransack the house, forceful interrogation. Charge them for any infraction you find.
:doh: She passed on a letter to the FBI. She told nobody, and if she said it on the Senate floor she has immunity. You guys are getting flailing mad when they are ones flailing. Do not take the bait. Put him on the court and be done with it. Do not give into their kabuki theater. It's foolish.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14795
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:57 am

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:03 pm
oh, I fully believe she was involved in multiple, repeated gang bangs.

Just not by who she is claiming.
If she went back 9 more times, she must of enjoyed something about the parties.

Perhaps being humiliated?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14795
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:59 am

TheReal_ND wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:41 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:39 pm
TheReal_ND wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:24 pm

Agreed. I'm full on accelerationist now. Let them taste the whip once the left wins back power. They will cry so hard but the few remaining people with heads on their shoulders will have already checked out, waiting for the chance to fucking send these cunts to a gas chamber after shaving their heads.
Right now it looks like they will at least confirm Kav's, but if they don't take some kind of action to punish this bullshit i'm going to be pissed. What's my bro always say …………………….. burn it down.
I left the office after work and some stupid yankee was mouthing on and on about how he will never get the votes over the phone to some fuck head.

"Ok one person sure but look at all the people now!"

My cortisone levels are elevated.
Stop listening to the voices in your head... 😜
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14795
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Thu Sep 27, 2018 5:00 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:49 pm
Women who make up allegations like this need to go to prison.

People need to stop with the"we cannot prove it" bullshit. Yes we fucking can prove it when there was never any such party, none of the alleged witnesses corroborate it, and the story keeps changing and contradicting itself. All you have to prove is that the story contains lies. Boom. Done. Can the bitches please go to prison now? Can we all agree this shit has to stop?

For fuck sake. If this happened in the context of any other crime report these women would be facing charges.

And they are all connected to Soros with democratic party activist lawyers running the con?

Fucking charge them all.
If they are false charges, I 100% agree.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:43 am

clubgop wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:38 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:29 pm
clubgop wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:32 pm


If you can prove being anywhere in the vicinity of your town mayor 36 years ago and make similar accusations and get enough concerned housewives together that mayor is fucked. You give the local rag an exclusive like that have some desperate reporter eating out the palm of your hand.
No. You are a dude. If you did what she did, they'd lock your ass up.
Or print my account in penthouse letters.
Just make sure you got that D next to your name and you'll be fine.

You'd go to jail, dude. If you just declared that the mayor sexually assaulted you sometime between 20 and 35 years ago, but you can't pin down the exact date, place, and the people you said where there all deny it ever happening, then they will put cuffs on you and charge you.

It shouldn't be any different for women.

User avatar
doc_loliday
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by doc_loliday » Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:00 am

Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:15 am

Reality check: the problem of domestic and sexual violence today is more so a problem of female perpetrators than male perpetrators.
Who is more likely to be victimized by teen dating violence? If you’re quick to think it’s girls, new data shows you’re wrong. In a surprising twist, recently published research indicates boys are more likely to report being victims of dating violence committed by partners who hit, slap or push them.

Researchers with the University of British Columbia (UBC) and Simon Fraser University (SFU) conducted a longitudinal study of dating violence. While reports of physical abuse went down over time, they say there is a troubling gender-related trend.

Five percent of teens reported physical abuse from their dating partners in 2013, down from 6 percent in 2003. But in the last year, 5.8 percent of boys reported dating violence compared to 4.2 percent of girls.

“It could be that it’s still socially acceptable for girls to hit or slap boys in dating relationships,” says lead author Catherine Shaffer, a PhD student with SFU, in a release. “This has been found in studies of adolescents in other countries as well.”
https://www.studyfinds.org/boys-more-vi ... udy-finds/

I mean.. duh.

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:24 am

Both the funniest and saddest thing I've read during this whole ordeal.

I went back to a forum I long since stop posting in. It's 99% current Democrat (aka far, far left). The other 1% are Libertarian. Martin would be run out of town for being a conservative Trump loving alt-righter (he's not, but that's how his views would be received there). Anyways, one of the posters said that we need to back to 60 votes for confirmation so that the side are forced to work together. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I bet if I went back through the archives I'd find posts where that same poster supported the Democrats when they changed the rules from 60 to 50 for every other nomination. Elections have consequences, remember that one?

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:31 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:43 am
clubgop wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:38 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:29 pm


No. You are a dude. If you did what she did, they'd lock your ass up.
Or print my account in penthouse letters.
Just make sure you got that D next to your name and you'll be fine.

You'd go to jail, dude. If you just declared that the mayor sexually assaulted you sometime between 20 and 35 years ago, but you can't pin down the exact date, place, and the people you said where there all deny it ever happening, then they will put cuffs on you and charge you.

It shouldn't be any different for women.
No I wouldn't. I'd be dismissed as a crank.