Google Memo

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25283
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Google Memo

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:12 am

The Conservative wrote:
DBTrek wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:I just think we need to take a step back from all this and recognize that it's perfectly okay for us to have problems with the other sex or even other races in many contexts. There's nothing wrong with it.
That sounds a lot more reasonable than "WE ARE AT WAR WITH WOMEN!!! . . . and Muslims . . . and blacks . . . and Mexicans . . . and holy shit, our critics suddenly look like they're completely reasonable for labeling us a bunch of klansmen."

I can get 100% behind "It's ok to have problems with . . ."
I'm not jumping in on the White Man's RACE/GENDER WAR vs. X
I'm only at war against people who want to change our ways of life to suit them, that is not freedom.
...by imposing your own way of life?
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Google Memo

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:13 am

Male privilege is the privilege of not having anybody to blame for the consequences of our own decisions.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18728
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Google Memo

Post by Martin Hash » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:13 am

The "war against men" by women, minorities & weirdos, is a surrogate for the liberty vs. Collectivism battle. "Women's issues" are Collectivist issues.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Google Memo

Post by DBTrek » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:14 am

We'd do well to remember that women, Mexicans, blacks, and others have been part of the founding fiber of this country and "our way of life" since day one, then. The opposition has made great strides in preaching a message of separation from the national narrative based on identity politics. "Oh, you're not part of 'America' cuz the white man enslaved your people!", or "You're not part of America cuz you couldn't vote till the 20th century", and so on. They win their converts and make their strides by turning these people against "America", and thereby making them outsiders who are opposed to the common narrative.

I'd suggest the best counter strategy is to remind these folks that they ARE part of America, and always have been. Remind them that an attack on American ideals and culture is, in fact, an attack against themselves and their ancestors.

The wrong strategy would be to hunker down and be like "Fuck you guys, we're at war with all of you!"

Sure, there will be a sizeable portion of citizens constantly attacking us, our institutions, our society, etc, all the time. But we'll beat them by stealing their numbers, not by playing into their narrative.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18728
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Google Memo

Post by Martin Hash » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:16 am

Dude, what's your plan? I suppose you support what happened at Google?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Google Memo

Post by DBTrek » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:16 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:Guys like DB will always throw other men under the bus for female approval. That's not going to change until he makes contact with the family court system and has his children taken from him because of his sex. I just shrug it off at this point.
Guys like StA will marry strippers, lose their jobs, lose their kids and then blame women or any other handy scapegoat within arms reach. You just have to accept that people who consistently make bad decisions and are unable to accept any responsibility are generally bitter and prone to lashing out at others.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Google Memo

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:16 am

Given that all civilizations in history were built by men, had you guys not actually considered what a civilization would look like if women were to build it?

Because that's pretty much SJW/collectivism. I doubt it would function for long, but that's where we would have been going had this not begun to turn around.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Google Memo

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:17 am

DBTrek wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Guys like DB will always throw other men under the bus for female approval. That's not going to change until he makes contact with the family court system and has his children taken from him because of his sex. I just shrug it off at this point.
Guys like StA will marry strippers, lose their jobs, lose their kids and then blame women or any other handy scapegoat within arms reach. You just have to accept that people who consistently make bad decisions and are unable to accept any responsibility are generally bitter and prone to lashing out at others.

LOL

Okay, guy. You are the one good guy. Help yourself to attacking other men and defending shit like this. I am sure women will finally respect you after you reach some critical mass of self-hatred and backstabbing. :lol:
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Google Memo

Post by DBTrek » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:17 am

Martin Hash wrote:Dude, what's your plan? I suppose you support what happened at Google?
Nope. You suppose wrong.
It's possible to identify a serious problem without also reacting to it like an idiot.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Google Memo

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:18 am

I'll say it again:

Male privilege is the privilege of not having anybody to blame for the consequences of our own decisions.

That is glaringly obvious in the OP story.