Degenerate Faggots Starting Civil War2.0
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 14794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Someone name me the last time a 'Right wing' or Conservative or Bubba mob went into the streets, rioted, beat people and murdered people. Name it, because frankly, I can't. However I can rattle of this type of violent intolerant behavior from the Lefties.The Conservative wrote:You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
In the US, don't get cute.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 25281
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Do you even history, bro?C-Mag wrote:Someone name me the last time a 'Right wing' or Conservative or Bubba mob went into the streets, rioted, beat people and murdered people. Name it, because frankly, I can't. However I can rattle of this type of violent intolerant behavior from the Lefties.The Conservative wrote:You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
In the US, don't get cute.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_draft_riotsOn May 31 and June 1, 1921, a white mob started the Tulsa race riot, attacking residents and businesses of the African-American community of Greenwood in Tulsa, Oklahoma,[1] in what is considered one of the worst incidents of racial violence in United States History.[2] The attack, carried out on the ground and by air, destroyed more than 35 blocks of the district, at the time the wealthiest black community in the nation. More than 800 people were admitted to hospitals and more than 6,000 black residents were arrested and detained, many for several days.[3] The Oklahoma Bureau of Vital Statistics officially recorded 39 dead, but the American Red Cross estimated 300, a number supported by historians since then. Most were black.
I'm assuming you meant "in the US", because Europe has had tons of them in the last few years.The New York draft riots (July 13–16, 1863), known at the time as Draft Week,[3] were violent disturbances in Lower Manhattan, widely regarded as the culmination of working-class discontent with new laws passed by Congress that year to draft men to fight in the ongoing American Civil War. The riots remain the largest civil and racial insurrection in American history, aside from the Civil War itself.[4]
Last edited by SuburbanFarmer on Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Ok, now recent history.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Do you even history, bro?C-Mag wrote:Someone name me the last time a 'Right wing' or Conservative or Bubba mob went into the streets, rioted, beat people and murdered people. Name it, because frankly, I can't. However I can rattle of this type of violent intolerant behavior from the Lefties.The Conservative wrote:
You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.
In the US, don't get cute.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riothttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_draft_riotsOn May 31 and June 1, 1921, a white mob started the Tulsa race riot, attacking residents and businesses of the African-American community of Greenwood in Tulsa, Oklahoma,[1] in what is considered one of the worst incidents of racial violence in United States History.[2] The attack, carried out on the ground and by air, destroyed more than 35 blocks of the district, at the time the wealthiest black community in the nation. More than 800 people were admitted to hospitals and more than 6,000 black residents were arrested and detained, many for several days.[3] The Oklahoma Bureau of Vital Statistics officially recorded 39 dead, but the American Red Cross estimated 300, a number supported by historians since then. Most were black.The New York draft riots (July 13–16, 1863), known at the time as Draft Week,[3] were violent disturbances in Lower Manhattan, widely regarded as the culmination of working-class discontent with new laws passed by Congress that year to draft men to fight in the ongoing American Civil War. The riots remain the largest civil and racial insurrection in American history, aside from the Civil War itself.[4]
-
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:57 pm
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
a century ago
-
- Posts: 25281
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Life isn't fair. Welcome.The Conservative wrote:You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Nah man, like, remember the Nika riots against Justinian? Those were like, so analogous to what's going on now, man. Like, cultures don't have any effect on people, man. It's, like, all the elites, keeping us down.Dand wrote:a century ago
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
Why do you always default to the "whatevs man, life sucks" argument after having your arguments refuted?GrumpyCatFace wrote:Life isn't fair. Welcome.The Conservative wrote:You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
-
- Posts: 25281
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War
I'm speaking to the larger Right faction on this board, and by extension, the country. You've seen it, you're part of it, you know exactly what I'm talking about. Most of the responses to my posts are to the larger Left, and I get tarred with all kinds of Socialist/Marxist/Bullshit labels. Turnabout and all that.Xenophon wrote:No. I advocated an appropriate response to dangerous rioters destroying property and fighting people in the street. I said nothing about military police. They would only be called in to police a civilian population under martial law (in the US).Xenophon wrote:I agree that the MAGA moron had every right to defend himself. But that's not what you're discussing. You're talking about why a mob of military police didn't descend on the scene and stop it. I'm saying it was a wise move.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
All I've said that would resemble an ideological cleansing is that the authorities need to crack down on anarchist rioters. If you have a problem with that, you and your 6'2, well-built frame can go pound sand. Defense isn't always "wait until they punch you in the face or hit you with a pipe". I'm sure you don't understand that, given your only combat experience comes from hip-tossing teenagers in your karate class, or whatever martial art it is you threatened Smitty with on the DCF.
I also agree that rioters need to be stopped. However, they didn't reach an unacceptable level of violence, IMO - with a single exception. This was not a city-wide mob scene, this was a few dozen people acting like animals for a few hours. It could have been much, much worse.
And yes, you guys are constantly using masturbating over the idea of lamppost hangings and firing squads to 'destroy the cancer' of people that think differently than you. Your bullshit is being heard by millions of people, and will create more reactions like this. It's inevitable.
It could have been worse. Everything can be worse. "Oh, I just got robbed, but at least he didn't chain me to the back of his Trans-Am and drag me down a dirt road."
I have not once said to hang these people. I have never said that they need to be shot via firing squad. Do not project others views upon me. You're engaging with me now, Grumps. Don't get sidetracked.
Even if I'm only referring to you yourself, you have no issue painting "Them" as pussies that can't fight, can't shoot a gun, aren't dangerous... yet here you are clutching pearls when some windows get smashed, and calling for a violent crackdown. Ironic.