DBTrek wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2020 8:59 am
You don't have any guns.
You're a Marxist.
You've never seen my biceps.
When was the last time you pitchforked 5 tons of thatching straw in 18lb bundles?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
It may be possible that you can't be a Marxist without being egalitarian but it is perfectly possible that you can believe all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities without being a Marxist.
After all, you can be a Nationalist without being a racist but it is far less likely that you can be a racist without being a Nationalist.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Martin Hash wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2020 9:13 am
DB could be saying: if you don't have any guns, you're going to be Marxist.
Damn, that means the Cold War was all a massive waste of time and money.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Montegriffo wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2020 9:15 am
It may be possible that you can't be a Marxist without being egalitarian but it is perfectly possible that you can believe all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities without being a Marxist.
After all, you can be a Nationalist without being a racist but it is far less likely that you can be a racist without being a Nationalist.
Egalitarians are the enemy: using the word “Marxist” was confusing the message, I agree.
p.s. What does Nationalism have to do with racists?
Martin Hash wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2020 9:13 am
DB could be saying: if you don't have any guns, you're going to be Marxist.
Damn, that means the Cold War was all a massive waste of time and money.
Considering where we were just before Trump was elected, we lost The Cold War, so yeah.
Smitty is going to be disappointed to hear that he lost the Cold War.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Montegriffo wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2020 9:15 am
It may be possible that you can't be a Marxist without being egalitarian but it is perfectly possible that you can believe all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities without being a Marxist.
After all, you can be a Nationalist without being a racist but it is far less likely that you can be a racist without being a Nationalist.
Egalitarians are the enemy: using the word “Marxist” was confusing the message, I agree.
p.s. What does Nationalism have to do with racists?
Nothing per se, find me a racist who rejects Nationalism though.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.