Redefinitions From The Left

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by DBTrek » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:22 am

Martin Hash wrote:The whole preservation of wealth idea is what leads to aristocracies. Live your life, spend your money, trying to build a dynasty for your children is medieval bullshit.

All the Hash kids are like WTF?!?! Thanks, dad!
:lol:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by StCapps » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:27 am

DBTrek wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:The whole preservation of wealth idea is what leads to aristocracies. Live your life, spend your money, trying to build a dynasty for your children is medieval bullshit.

All the Hash kids are like WTF?!?! Thanks, dad!
:lol:
I like how Hash think the US government will spend his wealth in a more beneficial way to society than his children when he dies. Either he thinks that his kids would waste it all on hookers and blow, or he has a misplaced faith in the federal government to wisely spend the resources that he has accumulated. Either way his one-size fits all plan for the government to confiscate all inheritances, is pretty retarded.

Yo Hash, whatever happened to that liberty shit you champion? Guess doing away with inheritances via government confiscation is more important than liberty to you, odd.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18734
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Martin Hash » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:32 am

StCapps wrote:
DBTrek wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:The whole preservation of wealth idea is what leads to aristocracies. Live your life, spend your money, trying to build a dynasty for your children is medieval bullshit.

All the Hash kids are like WTF?!?! Thanks, dad!
:lol:
I like how Hash think the US government will spend his wealth when he dies in more beneficial way to society than his children, that's shit is hilarious. Either his kids are assholes who would waste it all on hookers and blow, or he has misplaced faith in the federal government. Either way his plan for the government to confiscate all inheritances, is pretty retarded.
Any pikers reading this are nothing compared to the Nouveau Aristocracy. A tiny bit of greed on your part results in serfdom for all but the 1%. Everyone would be MUCH better off if opportunity was released back into the economy on a continuous basis.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18734
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Martin Hash » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:34 am

BTW, deficit spending (resulting in the $20 billion debt) does more to redistribute wealth than anything else in the economy.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by StCapps » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:35 am

Martin Hash wrote:Any pikers reading this are nothing compared to the Nouveau Aristocracy. A tiny bit of greed on your part results in serfdom for everyone but the 1%. Everyone would be MUCH better off if opportunity was released back into the economy on a continuous basis.
No they wouldn't because they would just hide their money, so you can't confiscate it, you'll just turn inheritance into a black market, and you'll hurt innovation, not help it. People like to leave shit for their kids to enjoy, it's one of big reasons many people go out of their way to accumulate wealth in the first place, it won't be better for everyone if you tell them to go fuck themselves, Hash knows best, just give it to the government.

What happened to you being the champion of liberty hash? Now you know what is best for everyone all of a sudden so they should be forced by law to do as you say? You sound like a commie, not the pro-liberty guy you pretend to be.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18734
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Martin Hash » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:38 am

Accumulating wealth is a good thing? WTF. You'll be the richest man in the graveyard unless your goal is to make your offspring part of the aristocracy.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by StCapps » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:39 am

Martin Hash wrote:Accumulating wealth is a good thing? WTF. You'll be the richest man in the graveyard unless your goal is to make your offspring part of the aristocracy.
Nothing wrong with aristocracy, as long as merit allows one to become part of that aristocracy. Noblesse Oblige.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18734
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Martin Hash » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:40 am

StCapps wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:Accumulating wealth is a good thing? WTF. You'll be the richest man in the graveyard unless your goal is to make your offspring part of the aristocracy.
Nothing wrong with aristocracy, as long as merit allows one to become part of that aristocracy.
Said like a true Canadian. The House of Windsor certainly "deserve" their vast wealth. God save the Queen.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by StCapps » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:41 am

Martin Hash wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:Accumulating wealth is a good thing? WTF. You'll be the richest man in the graveyard unless your goal is to make your offspring part of the aristocracy.
Nothing wrong with aristocracy, as long as merit allows one to become part of that aristocracy.
Said like a true Canadian. God save the Queen.
Noblesse Oblige. Americans are way too knee jerk on the anti-aristocracy tip, there will always be an aristocracy, you can't get rid of it, trying to eliminate aristocracy from existence is a fools errand. You might as well try to put a stop to all poverty or war, no matter how hard you squeeze your butt cheeks together, it is never going to happen.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18734
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Martin Hash » Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:44 am

StCapps wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:
StCapps wrote:Nothing wrong with aristocracy, as long as merit allows one to become part of that aristocracy.
Said like a true Canadian. The House of Windsor certainly "deserve" their vast wealth. God save the Queen.
Noblesse Oblige. Americans are way too knee jerk on the anti-aristocracy tip, there will always be an aristocracy, you can't get rid of it, trying eliminate from existence is a fools errand.
Maybe but the United States was founded on the idea that there is no Class system, explicit or de facto. (Though I agree the hypocrisy was rampant.)
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change