DBTrek wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:I don't know why we can't get more females posting here. We're just talking about our wive's menstrual periods and shit.Martin Hash wrote:The sooner men understand they're in a war with women, the sooner they can start fighting back.
It is a mystery why more women don't post.
Along the same lines, why don't the Stormfront message boards have more blacks? I don't get it?
pffft
That sounds a lot more reasonable than "WE ARE AT WAR WITH WOMEN!!! . . . and Muslims . . . and blacks . . . and Mexicans . . . and holy shit, our critics suddenly look like they're completely reasonable for labeling us a bunch of klansmen."Speaker to Animals wrote:I just think we need to take a step back from all this and recognize that it's perfectly okay for us to have problems with the other sex or even other races in many contexts. There's nothing wrong with it.
DBTrek wrote: "WE ARE AT WAR WITH WOMEN!!! . . . and Muslims . . . and blacks . . . and Mexicans . . . and holy shit, our critics suddenly look like they're completely reasonable for labeling us a bunch of klansmen."
Well . . . that says more about your powers of perception and understanding of mathematical probabilities than it does about much else. They're 51% of the US population and you apparently believe members of this forum never interact with them.Martin Hash wrote:I don't think anybody on this forum has any contact with women, I mean "women," as per society.
Kath and Ooky were usually strawmanned the hardest. Somehow, Penner and MilSpecs have flown under the radar for the most part. But yeah, it's been pretty embarrassing to watch at times.Martin Hash wrote:I don't think anybody on this forum has any contact with women, I mean "women," as per society. Go to a Democratic meeting. Read what ooky, MilSpecs & Penner post. You think they want to go back to how it was? It's a zero-sum game situation, guys, and what they get, you lose. It's called "cognitive dissonance" when people know something but refuse to confront the reality of the situation, and telling that Kath, who was not like that, got so frustrated posting here because she was treated as if she had those opinions because her screen name was obviously female.
Did I need to spell that womyn? (I thought putting it in quotes was enough.)DBTrek wrote:Well . . . that says more about your powers of perception and understanding of mathematical probabilities than it does about much else. They're 51% of the US population and you apparently believe members of this forum never interact with them.Martin Hash wrote:I don't think anybody on this forum has any contact with women, I mean "women," as per society.
/shrug
Behind every successful man is a strong woman. You just proved that one in spades.Martin Hash wrote:Gwynne is much more conservative than I am. She's one of the 53% of White women who voted for Trump.Zlaxer wrote:Does your wife read this boardMartin Hash wrote: The sooner men understand they're in a war with women, the sooner they can start fighting back. Democracy makes the war possible, so basically this is the first time in human history that women are in charge. Men can't simply MGTOW it, because women are getting their hands on the controls of The State, and there won't be anywhere to hide. The Democratic Party is already gone.
Jordan Peterson's theory is that women are Collectivist by nature.
I'm only at war against people who want to change our ways of life to suit them, that is not freedom.DBTrek wrote:That sounds a lot more reasonable than "WE ARE AT WAR WITH WOMEN!!! . . . and Muslims . . . and blacks . . . and Mexicans . . . and holy shit, our critics suddenly look like they're completely reasonable for labeling us a bunch of klansmen."Speaker to Animals wrote:I just think we need to take a step back from all this and recognize that it's perfectly okay for us to have problems with the other sex or even other races in many contexts. There's nothing wrong with it.
I can get 100% behind "It's ok to have problems with . . ."
I'm not jumping in on the White Man's RACE/GENDER WAR vs. X
Martin Hash wrote:I don't think anybody on this forum has any contact with women, I mean "women," as per society. Go to a Democratic meeting. Read what ooky, MilSpecs & Penner post. You think they want to go back to how it was? It's a zero-sum game situation, guys, and what they get, you lose. It's called "cognitive dissonance" when people know something but refuse to confront the reality of the situation.
Absolution Style by Premium phpBB Styles
