7 Earth-Size Planets Found by NASA

[C-Mag]

Spotting a rock in space is not that easy.

Well, it seems like a higher priority for NASA than telling me about Global Warming.


Our agencies priorities are so fucked. You have the FBI that has all kinds of time stage a coup, but no time to stop Tsarnev brothers, or the Sand Bernadino or mr cruz or the Orlando shooter.

Why would it be a higher priority than GW? It's not like we could do anything about it unlike CO2 emlssions.

Uh........................ because Climate Sceince is a fucking joke.

[Montegriffo]

That is a political opinion not based on the science.
If you really don't think that the planet is warming due to human activity you are clearly not paying attention.

[C-Mag]

That is a political opinion not based on the science.
If you really don't think that the planet is warming due to human activity you are clearly not paying attention.

Prove it.

The most powerful force in our Solar System is the sun. It's likely to have far more dramatic affects on the temperature of the planet than humans. And we have no comprehension of the Astronomical cycles our sun may be on.

You go ahead an post whatever 'settled sceince' about global warming you want............... I'll debunk it.

[Montegriffo]

[quote="C-Mag")

You go ahead an post whatever 'settled sceince' about global warming you want............... I'll debunk it.[/quote]

Well that's a nice open minded way to start a debate.
I'll decline thanks, I've got some blood to squeeze out of a stone.

[Haumana]

That is a political opinion not based on the science.
If you really don't think that the planet is warming due to human activity you are clearly not paying attention.

That you still believe that mainstream "science" isn't based on politics is quaint. Have you not seen the "science" behind the proliferation oxycodones? Which point of view is getting the most funding? There is a ton of money at stake. Money drives the snipe hunt, not the other way around.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallsh ... 68401b25fa

Respondents tended to shift their beliefs towards the prevailing opinions among others in their parties, with Democrats becoming more likely to believe climate change is occurring and Republicans becoming more likely to believe it is not happening or is exaggerated.

Scientists are just other respondents. Have you ever really tried to dig into this subject? I would love to see something that was presented straight down the middle of the plate. Link?

[JohnDonne]

Carlus, what part of the whole climate change argument are you a skeptic of?

That we're in the midst of unusual climate change?

That we have high levels of co2 in the atmosphere, much higher than the last 400,000 years?

That those extreme levels have been growing exponentially since industrialization?

That co2 causes climate change?

That man's activity has caused the bulk of the increase in co2 in the last hundred years?

That if we produce less co2 it will decrease the climate change?

Perhaps it would be useful to ask what's the minimal evidence that would convince you that man made climate change is more likely than not? For example, is circumstantial evidence valid in your eyes? If your dog was playing in the mud, and your kitchen door was left open, and later you find paw prints on your kitchen floor, would you not consider that proof that your dog created the paw prints in the absence of other evidence?

[SuburbanFarmer]

Venus is much, much hotter than Mercury, due to greenhouse gases. That’s probably the simplest way to explain the effect to a layman.

[Fife]

[Fife]

https://ombreolivier.liberty.me/climate-derp/

[Montegriffo]

Venus is much, much hotter than Mercury, due to greenhouse gases. That’s probably the simplest way to explain the effect to a layman.

How do you explain it to someone who is convinced AGW is just a Communist plot to separate them from their hard earned cash and who refuses to even look at the data?