He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by **Okeefenokee** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 9:05 am

clubgop wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
No one gives a shit what a pedo brit and a gun grabbing Aussie think. Patriots won, you tea sipping wig wearing fags lost again.

They think they've fooled someone into thinking they care about football or the 1A.

Post by **Fife** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 9:08 am

Yep, sorry Limeys. The next American Football league won't be playing games in London.

Post by **C-Mag** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:43 am

NFL players, coaches and owners jump in bed with Kaepernick dan join him in kneeling, now getting sued by Kaepernick.

Fucking NFL, you made your bed, lie in it.

Post by **SilverEagle** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:53 am

C-Mag wrote:NFL players, coaches and owners jump in bed with Kaepernick dan join him in kneeling, now getting sued by Kaepernick.

Fucking NFL, you made your bed, lie in it.

That is some funny shit.

Post by **SuburbanFarmer** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:02 am

Yeah, I'm looking forward to how this plays out. How do you prove "collusion not to hire" in a court of law without any evidence??

He didn't anticipate the Machine eating his little protest for breakfast, assimilating it into themselves, and casting him aside for the trouble. Now he's got no career, but a few mill in the bank after quitting his job, and an army of 'supporters' that are already forgetting about him.

Of course, how could he have seen it coming? He only had a football-college education, after all... Poor millionaire on suicide watch.

Post by **Speaker to Animals** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:49 am

Maybe he can move to Cuba and help revive American football on the island. Pro tip: if you don't stand for their national anthem, they will torture you.

Post by **LVH2** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:00 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Yeah, I'm looking forward to how this plays out. How do you prove "collusion not to hire" in a court of law without any evidence??

He didn't anticipate the Machine eating his little protest for breakfast, assimilating it into themselves, and casting him aside for the trouble. Now he's got no career, but a few mill in the bank after quitting his job, and an army of 'supporters' that are already forgetting about him.

Of course, how could he have seen it coming? He only had a football-college education, after all... Poor millionaire on suicide watch.

While ignorant of the laws, I wouldn't be surprised if he wins if the only issue is "were his skills desirable?"

Sports is one of the few jobs where your effectiveness can be very closely measured and in his last year, he put up decent numbers on a terrible team.

Now, if the owners can simply say, "sure, he was good enough, but we are in the entertainment business and we didn't think our fans would like him," then he's probably boned.

Post by **C-Mag** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:09 am

LVH2 wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Yeah, I'm looking forward to how this plays out. How do you prove "collusion not to hire" in a court of law without any evidence??

He didn't anticipate the Machine eating his little protest for breakfast, assimilating it into themselves, and casting him aside for the trouble. Now he's got no career, but a few mill in the bank after quitting his job, and an army of 'supporters' that are already forgetting about him.

Of course, how could he have seen it coming? He only had a football-college education, after all... Poor millionaire on suicide watch.
While ignorant of the laws, I wouldn't be surprised if he wins if the only issue is "were his skills desirable?"

Sports is one of the few jobs where your effectiveness can be very closely measured and in his last year, he put up decent numbers on a terrible team.

Now, if the owners can simply say, "sure, he was good enough, but we are in the entertainment business and we didn't think our fans would like him," then he's probably boned.

I don't know how he could win. Teams get rid of players all the time for no more than being a poor teammate, or being a distraction to the team. There would have to be a league wide written letter to black ball him.

Like BroGrump said, it will be fun to watch. The NFL now gets to defend itself against the player they paid $100 + million over a few years and defended against the POTUS.

Post by **LVH2** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:20 am

Well, I just don't know. There obviously are some issue where these explanations don't fly.

"We think our fans would prefer a white QB" "We thought a Muslim player would be distracting."

Is taking a political stance an issue where they can wash their hands of you?

Is using the workplace to take a political stance?

Anyway, I do think this is the primary reason for his unemployment. Though maybe his skills deteriorated very rapidly.

Actually, thinking it through, I suppose the central question is really if there was collusion, or if every team independently said "we don't need this."

Post by **SuburbanFarmer** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:38 am

LVH2 wrote: every team independently said "we don't need this."

99.999999999% chance correct.

He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.