Net Neutrality

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by DBTrek » Mon Dec 18, 2017 9:55 am

I’ve cited six articles to your zero, and your brilliant response is to bray about how I’ve made no argument as you bounce around in an emotional frenzy fueled by nothing but meds and your feels. That is all you ever have, a hyper emotional opinion. Your one source for every thread.

Please, you have no standing on this forum to criticize anyone for vacuous posts, #1 poster (again, 2nd forum in a row).
Last edited by DBTrek on Mon Dec 18, 2017 9:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by The Conservative » Mon Dec 18, 2017 9:56 am

DBTrek wrote:I’ve cited six articles to your zero, and your brilliant response is to bray about how I’ve made no argument as you bounce around in an emotional frenzy fueled by nothing but meds and Your feels.

Please, you have no standing on this forum to criticize anyone for vacuous posts, #1 poster (again, 2nd forum in a row).

As I said, he posts blatherskite.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:00 am

DBTrek wrote:I’ve cited six articles to your zero, and your brilliant response is to bray about how I’ve made no argument as you bounce around in an emotional frenzy fueled by nothing but meds and your feels. That is all you ever have, a hyper emotional opinion. Your one source for every thread.

Please, you have no standing on this forum to criticize anyone for vacuous posts, #1 poster (again, 2nd forum in a row).
Engage with the argument some time..

I have honestly not seen you actually argue anything in years, DB. I don't know what it is you think you have become, but signaling your intellectual prowess isn't exactly a winning strategy for you these days..


But we all know you can't engage in argument, therefore you won't, and you will just keep insulting people and flooding the forum with nonsense posts like this one. This is all you have. It's all you are. You will never amount to anything more than this. I have challenged you numerous times to bring an argument and you couldn't do it. I don't think you have it in you.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by The Conservative » Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:06 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
DBTrek wrote:I’ve cited six articles to your zero, and your brilliant response is to bray about how I’ve made no argument as you bounce around in an emotional frenzy fueled by nothing but meds and your feels. That is all you ever have, a hyper emotional opinion. Your one source for every thread.

Please, you have no standing on this forum to criticize anyone for vacuous posts, #1 poster (again, 2nd forum in a row).
Engage with the argument some time..

I have honestly not seen you actually argue anything in years, DB. I don't know what it is you think you have become, but signaling your intellectual prowess isn't exactly a winning strategy for you these days..


But we all know you can't engage in argument, therefore you won't, and you will just keep insulting people and flooding the forum with nonsense posts like this one. This is all you have. It's all you are. You will never amount to anything more than this. I have challenged you numerous times to bring an argument and you couldn't do it. I don't think you have it in you.
You've challenged me too, and I countered, you've yet to respond... afraid some "retard" (as you so well ineloquently put it) is going to kick your ass all over this forum?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:07 am

You are borderline retarded, TC. I don't want to engage with you because you always insist on making it insulting, and beating on a retarded person is a no-win situation for anybody.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by DBTrek » Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:10 am

And that’s the award winning, clearly *not* vacuous content StA uses to achieve top post count.

He is his own punchline.
:lol:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:14 am

It seems like the thing that allowed the internet to beat cable television as a media provider was that it didn't function like the telecom companies.

The fact that those companies can now work to make the internet function along the model that is most beneficial to them, the cable television model, is sort of an own goal, free-market-wise.

Not bad, or even inherently more expensive... just a return to a model that consumers already abandoned.

Although, as far as I am concerned, go ahead and make the internet worse. Maybe these damn kids'll get their noses out of them celly-phones they like su'damn much.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:19 am

DBTrek wrote:And that’s the award winning, clearly *not* vacuous content StA uses to achieve top post count.

He is his own punchline.
:lol:

So you've got nothing. No surprise there.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by DBTrek » Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:20 am

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:It seems like the thing that allowed the internet to beat cable television as a media provider was that it didn't function like the telecom companies.

The fact that those companies can now work to make the internet function along the model that is most beneficial to them, the cable television model, is sort of an own goal, free-market-wise.

Not bad, or even inherently more expensive... just a return to a model that consumers already abandoned.

Although, as far as I am concerned, go ahead and make the internet worse. Maybe these damn kids'll get their noses out of them celly-phones they like su'damn much.
Not that repetition number five billion will make a difference, but all data is not equal. Data packets carrying information to self driving vehicles is clearly more important that data packets carrying a pic of Hitler bowling to Nuke Dog.

Thus a Federal mandate declaring that there can be no discrimination between these packets not only retards innovation and development, but it does so dangerously.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:23 am

A self-driving vehicle that requires TCP/IP packets to not drop in order not to kill people is probably a non-starter.

TCP/IP was not designed for critical systems.

Yes, all data is equal. It's just fucking data, people. 1s and 0s.

LOL