DBTrek wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:You were caught in several contradictions you refused to answer:
(1) If I am a racist for wanting to maintain a white majority in white nations, then so too are Mexicans racist who want to maintain a Latino majority in Mexico (i.e. pretty much all of them would be racists, then).
(2) If you really opposed race-based laws, you'd be throwing equal tantrums about all the anti-white legislation and policies in this country, but you do not.
(3) If ethno-nationalism is so dangerous, you'd actually be concerned about the only ethno-nationalists in this country who possess real power: Latino and black nationalists, including quite a few federal judges and members of congress. But you don't give a shit about them. You only get upset when whites openly discuss reciprocating what these people are doing to our detriment.
That's just three of the big ones. There were more. But you refuse to acknowledge any of them.
I'm happy to answer those.
- 1. If Mexicans decide to legislate that white Mexicans must maintain a demographic majority, then that's clearly racist. What else could it be? The whole premise centers around Mexicans of a particular skin tone maintaining demographic supremacy over other Mexicans via the power of the state.
2. I provide a considerable number of outrageous stories about SJW/leftist/academic/legislative and media attacks upon white males, white people, and white culture as anyone on this forum (or the last one) can tell you. Why you would seek to pretend otherwise is baffling. You obviously know your claim is false, as do all regular users here - so ? Now, it's true I don't leverage the stories into "Let's start a race war" or "Let's mandate keeping America white" - but that's because I'm not insane. I can defend my race, my gender, and my culture without trying to destroy other races, genders, or cultures.
3. There are no ethno-nationalists that "possess real power" in America, so you're right - I don't lose sleep over non-entities and fringe players.
There you go.
All three
"never adressed" so-called contradictions, addressed.
1. Dishonest. White is a synonym for our race, just as Latino is a synonym for a broad racial group. Mexico is a good counterpoint because, as Nick mentioned, there exists as much variance within Mesoamerican people as there does within European peoples. Mexico's immigration policy is unabashedly supportive of their maintaining a Mesoamerican demographic majority. They once had a ruling white government and they fought wars to overthrow it and change the name back to Mexico. Then there is the little example of Texas. Whites migrating in as filibusters only to secede land over to the US is a legitimate issue to them. They have as much right to Mexico as we do to the United States. If whites are "racists" for wanting to remain a majority demographic in white nations, then so too are literally every other racial group on this planet, DB.
2. I am not talking about SJWs in this context (Your criss-thread sniping), DB. I am talking about anti-white laws and policies. Don't try to deflect this.
3. That's factually false. We need to find that "fact check false jingle to play in the forum. Ethno-nationalists run the DNC now. Where was your outrage when the DNC almost elected a black nationalist to run it? Where is your outrage about a la raza congressmen from Chicago who openly admits he only looks out for the interests of his people and wants to punish whites? Where is your outrage about the fact that a Latino nationalist organization has sub-organizations for lawyers and judges, of which they have more than a few. Oh wait. I remember when it was suggested Trump could not possibly receive a fair hearing in a civil case presided over by a Latino nationalist judge with open membership in la raza, you screamed RACIST! back then too.. hmm..
