GrumpyCatFace wrote:
NFL 2017
-
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am
Re: NFL 2017
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.
-
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: NFL 2017
Joe Haden seems to be poised to go from the Browns to the Steelers.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2050 ... -told-espn
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2050 ... -told-espn
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: NFL 2017
Really annoys me that there STILL isn't a way to pay for a streaming NFL package.
Jeez, guys, it's 2017. There's no entrepreneur out there who can figure out a way to charge some clown like me $200 and allow me to stream all the NFL games (especially local) to my Amazon TV, or phone, or tablet? Can no one figure this out? No one thinks there's a market for people who have cut the cable but still want to watch football and can't get decent reception off a digital antenna?
Money on the table, lads.
Money just left all over the table, piling up, blossoming with verdigris, waiting to be perched on by a fire wyrm.
Disappointed.
Jeez, guys, it's 2017. There's no entrepreneur out there who can figure out a way to charge some clown like me $200 and allow me to stream all the NFL games (especially local) to my Amazon TV, or phone, or tablet? Can no one figure this out? No one thinks there's a market for people who have cut the cable but still want to watch football and can't get decent reception off a digital antenna?
Money on the table, lads.
Money just left all over the table, piling up, blossoming with verdigris, waiting to be perched on by a fire wyrm.
Disappointed.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: NFL 2017
+1000DBTrek wrote:Really annoys me that there STILL isn't a way to pay for a streaming NFL package.
Jeez, guys, it's 2017. There's no entrepreneur out there who can figure out a way to charge some clown like me $200 and allow me to stream all the NFL games (especially local) to my Amazon TV, or phone, or tablet? Can no one figure this out? No one thinks there's a market for people who have cut the cable but still want to watch football and can't get decent reception off a digital antenna?
Money on the table, lads.
Money just left all over the table, piling up, blossoming with verdigris, waiting to be perched on by a fire wyrm.
Disappointed.
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: NFL 2017
And you bitched about $100 glasses, talk about pathetic... cripes.GrumpyCatFace wrote:+1000DBTrek wrote:Really annoys me that there STILL isn't a way to pay for a streaming NFL package.
Jeez, guys, it's 2017. There's no entrepreneur out there who can figure out a way to charge some clown like me $200 and allow me to stream all the NFL games (especially local) to my Amazon TV, or phone, or tablet? Can no one figure this out? No one thinks there's a market for people who have cut the cable but still want to watch football and can't get decent reception off a digital antenna?
Money on the table, lads.
Money just left all over the table, piling up, blossoming with verdigris, waiting to be perched on by a fire wyrm.
Disappointed.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: NFL 2017
Don't muddy the waters in the thread turd breath.The Conservative wrote:And you bitched about $100 glasses, talk about pathetic... cripes.GrumpyCatFace wrote:+1000DBTrek wrote:Really annoys me that there STILL isn't a way to pay for a streaming NFL package.
Jeez, guys, it's 2017. There's no entrepreneur out there who can figure out a way to charge some clown like me $200 and allow me to stream all the NFL games (especially local) to my Amazon TV, or phone, or tablet? Can no one figure this out? No one thinks there's a market for people who have cut the cable but still want to watch football and can't get decent reception off a digital antenna?
Money on the table, lads.
Money just left all over the table, piling up, blossoming with verdigris, waiting to be perched on by a fire wyrm.
Disappointed.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Re: NFL 2017
It probably has something to do with the NFL's current contracts with the networks. Once those contracts are up then I bet we see something like this. The NFL wants more viewership so something like this would be huge for them. I just looked it up and the current contracts are from 2014-2022. So maybe in another 5 years. lolDBTrek wrote:Really annoys me that there STILL isn't a way to pay for a streaming NFL package.
Jeez, guys, it's 2017. There's no entrepreneur out there who can figure out a way to charge some clown like me $200 and allow me to stream all the NFL games (especially local) to my Amazon TV, or phone, or tablet? Can no one figure this out? No one thinks there's a market for people who have cut the cable but still want to watch football and can't get decent reception off a digital antenna?
Money on the table, lads.
Money just left all over the table, piling up, blossoming with verdigris, waiting to be perched on by a fire wyrm.
Disappointed.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: NFL 2017
No chance, until those ancient boomer zombies finally die off. EA STILL somehow has an exclusive game license, after 12 years.SilverEagle wrote:It probably has something to do with the NFL's current contracts with the networks. Once those contracts are up then I bet we see something like this. The NFL wants more viewership so something like this would be huge for them. I just looked it up and the current contracts are from 2014-2022. So maybe in another 5 years. lolDBTrek wrote:Really annoys me that there STILL isn't a way to pay for a streaming NFL package.
Jeez, guys, it's 2017. There's no entrepreneur out there who can figure out a way to charge some clown like me $200 and allow me to stream all the NFL games (especially local) to my Amazon TV, or phone, or tablet? Can no one figure this out? No one thinks there's a market for people who have cut the cable but still want to watch football and can't get decent reception off a digital antenna?
Money on the table, lads.
Money just left all over the table, piling up, blossoming with verdigris, waiting to be perched on by a fire wyrm.
Disappointed.
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: NFL 2017
ROLF, I'm just pointing out his lack of priorities.SilverEagle wrote:Don't muddy the waters in the thread turd breath.The Conservative wrote:And you bitched about $100 glasses, talk about pathetic... cripes.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
+1000
#NotOneRedCent