StCapps wrote: you're a faggot.
Ok I'm out if you can't debate in a civil manner.
StCapps wrote: you're a faggot.
Monte, ignore the word "faggot" and respond to this.StCapps wrote:Nope PEDs should not lead to life ban, you're a faggot. You want to virtue signal about sportmanship and impose draconian punishments to convince yourself you're helping level the playing field when you are doing the opposite, fuck off. PEDs can actually help the less athletically inclined from birth close the gap with the more athletically gifted, but you would rather have it so only the rich and the top athletes can afford the designer drugs that are designed to pass the drug screenings, while the small time guys still can't compete with them because they can't afford the drugs that best evade screening while their competition can. The drugs that give you best Performance Enhancing results aren't the most expensive PEDs, it's the ones that evade screenings that lead to the huge price tag.Montegriffo wrote:You want to harm yourself in your private life no problem. You want to damage the career of a rival sportsman and the sport itself by cheating then you don't get to keep your medal when you get caught and you deserve to be excluded from the sport.
You are making the playing field less level with your anti-PED witch hunt, not more level. That's because your ideas for fixing the issue of PEDs in sports are all based on ignorance of PEDs, it's no wonder you can't come up with effective counter measures to level the playing field, you don't care about actually doing anything about it, you just want to pretend to do something about it. You just want to "do something" no matter how ineffective your proposed strategy is, even if it's just a token measure that exacerbates the issue you are trying to fix, as long as you are too ignorant to know that it isn't working, you don't care, because the token measure makes you feel like you're doing your job, even when you're not.
Lifetime bans for taking PEDs, seriously go fuck yourself, people like you are ruining sports, not the athlete's taking the best supplements.
I've never said it was about leveling the playing field, that's just a strawman invented to argue against because it's easier than addressing my points about accepting the rules of the governing bodies put in place to protect the health of the atheletes and the integrity of the sport.California wrote: Monte, ignore the word "faggot" and respond to this.
If this is truly about leveling the playing field, what is wrong with StCapps' argument?
Then why should it be categorically illegal? What's wrong with someone like me who is most likely never going to compete in anything again taking PEDs to get in better shape?Montegriffo wrote:I've never said it was about leveling the playing field, that's just a strawman invented to argue against because it's easier than addressing my points about accepting the rules of the governing bodies put in place to protect the health of the atheletes and the integrity of the sport.California wrote: Monte, ignore the word "faggot" and respond to this.
If this is truly about leveling the playing field, what is wrong with StCapps' argument?
No such thing as a level playing field due to genetics, talent, money, parental support, altitude, race, age, sex, equipment, courage, nationality, resistance to pain etc etc .....
Whether Capps admits it or not many PEDs are bad for your health and legalising them in professional sports will lead to more people, especially young people, using them. It's a terrible example to give to children because rather than saying practice, train and work to become the best you can it says you can improve yourself through chemicals.