Mozilla - Deplatforming is Not Enough

[PartyOf5]

TC, STFU already. Nobody wants to hear you try and brag all the time. Especially when you can't get simple shit right.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Then ask questions, or STFU... because I seem to be more right about what is going on than most of the people playing catch-up.

Exactly one post from December 6th. In which you waffle between Firefox and brave.

this year?
... results. Yeah I rarely use Google. Also, Firefox at least appears to be interested in your privacy. Lots of easy tools to block trackers etc. Brave is the same way. But always be cautious to those entities that want to ”protect” your data by storing it on their servers.

And now you’re prancing about as if we’re fools for thinking Firefox was a privacy-based browser.

Do you see why nobody takes you seriously yet?

No, you are fools to think that this stuff wasn't there in the first place, there were too many signs out there to say that this was happening. Hell with the removal of people, and also the way that the environments, in general, have grown into a near dystopian situation, you'd be either extremely naive or a fool to not see the writing on the wall.

If you are trusting other people with your privacy, you are going to get what you deserve.

Indeed, but we need an internet browser, don’t we.

[The Conservative]

Exactly one post from December 6th. In which you waffle between Firefox and brave.



And now you’re prancing about as if we’re fools for thinking Firefox was a privacy-based browser.

Do you see why nobody takes you seriously yet?

No, you are fools to think that this stuff wasn't there in the first place, there were too many signs out there to say that this was happening. Hell with the removal of people, and also the way that the environments, in general, have grown into a near dystopian situation, you'd be either extremely naive or a fool to not see the writing on the wall.

If you are trusting other people with your privacy, you are going to get what you deserve.

Indeed, but we need an internet browser, don’t we.

Be smart about what you use, be smart about the system overall, you can't just say "oh this one promises not to do 'x'!"

If you trust an entity with your passwords, your information, and have it so you can see it, or use it "everywhere"... it's not secure, and especially not under your control...

[SuburbanFarmer]

No, you are fools to think that this stuff wasn't there in the first place, there were too many signs out there to say that this was happening. Hell with the removal of people, and also the way that the environments, in general, have grown into a near dystopian situation, you'd be either extremely naive or a fool to not see the writing on the wall.

If you are trusting other people with your privacy, you are going to get what you deserve.

Indeed, but we need an internet browser, don’t we.

Be smart about what you use, be smart about the system overall, you can't just say "oh this one promises not to do 'x'!"

If you trust an entity with your passwords, your information, and have it so you can see it, or use it "everywhere"... it's not secure, and especially not under your control...

Thank you for that very vague and useless advice.

[Ph64]

Additional precise and specific actions must also be taken:

Reveal who is paying for advertisements, how much they are paying and who is being targeted.

Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.

Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.

I greatly look forward to finding out who is paying for leftist advertising, how much they are paying, and who they are targeting, as well as meaningful transparency of the algorithms so we know who their brainwashing is being targeted to, as well as the full background and funding of the sources they are using to determine what is "factual"...

...wait... Are you saying those same rules won't apply to everyone equally?

[SilverEagle]

First I’ve heard of it but sure.

I've been saying use it since 2019... but it just shows how much people actually read what I post.

Most of your posts are a confused mess to tell us how smart you are. They’re not getting a deep readership.

+1

I like you TC but GCF is correct.

[The Conservative]

Indeed, but we need an internet browser, don’t we.

Be smart about what you use, be smart about the system overall, you can't just say "oh this one promises not to do 'x'!"

If you trust an entity with your passwords, your information, and have it so you can see it, or use it "everywhere"... it's not secure, and especially not under your control...

Thank you for that very vague and useless advice.

It's not vague, it's honest. The people need to take back control of their data, and the only way to do it is not to trust third parties. So if an entity says that "they can keep you protected" who keeps them protected? Follow the money, and you'll see your data is never truly protected unless you keep it off the internet.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Be smart about what you use, be smart about the system overall, you can't just say "oh this one promises not to do 'x'!"

If you trust an entity with your passwords, your information, and have it so you can see it, or use it "everywhere"... it's not secure, and especially not under your control...

Thank you for that very vague and useless advice.

It's not vague, it's honest. The people need to take back control of their data, and the only way to do it is not to trust third parties. So if an entity says that "they can keep you protected" who keeps them protected? Follow the money, and you'll see your data is never truly protected unless you keep it off the internet.

You can’t use a computer without a third-party involved. Every component and piece of software is from a different company.

There is no way to ‘take control of your data’.

[The Conservative]

Thank you for that very vague and useless advice.

It's not vague, it's honest. The people need to take back control of their data, and the only way to do it is not to trust third parties. So if an entity says that "they can keep you protected" who keeps them protected? Follow the money, and you'll see your data is never truly protected unless you keep it off the internet.

You can’t use a computer without a third-party involved. Every component and piece of software is from a different company.

There is no way to ‘take control of your data’.

Yes, yes there is, people just don't want to do it because it means an iota of inconvience.

[SuburbanFarmer]

It's not vague, it's honest. The people need to take back control of their data, and the only way to do it is not to trust third parties. So if an entity says that "they can keep you protected" who keeps them protected? Follow the money, and you'll see your data is never truly protected unless you keep it off the internet.

You can’t use a computer without a third-party involved. Every component and piece of software is from a different company.

There is no way to ‘take control of your data’.

Yes, yes there is, people just don't want to do it because it means an iota of inconvience.

Then enlighten us, master. How do you propose to control what information you release over the internet?

And if you just say ‘VPN’, I will foe you so fucking fast...