If Any Female Wants to Post

[Speaker to Animals]

Wait till society starts treating women no differently than men.

That is going to be a trip.

[Martin Hash]

It's really The Patriarch (liberty, meritocracy & Nationalism) vs. The Matriarchy (Collectivism, Equality & Globalism) NOT male vs. female, I just used that as shorthand in a thread hoping to attract female posters.

StA is a misogynist. As a female, I wouldn't respond to him, but you can respond to me, Hanarchy and Carlus; we would provide wife-loving debate. Going back to the OP, Scott Adams says he thinks having a Party dedicated to women may be a good thing. I don't agree with that because I grew up during a time when I was indoctrinated with ignoring someone's outward appearance and judging them by their actions (old Liberal stuff). Our 2 political Parties should be divided by ideology, not biology.

[Speaker to Animals]

Dude, what?

Don't respond to my posts, then, because you will just delete my trouncing your nonsense no differently than a "matriarch" would.

Seriously, why engage people like that when we all know you just delete people's posts when you lose?

LMFAO at "let's treat women no differently than men" as hating women, though. Seriously.

[Martin Hash]

Dude, what?

Don't respond to my posts, then, because you will just delete my trouncing your nonsense no differently "matriarch" would.

Seriously, why engage people like that when we all know you just delete people's posts when you lose?

Dude, start your own "I Hate Women" thread.

[DBTrek]

Fairly evident why women will not be posting here.
You got hostile and highly damaged males that can’t cope.
/shrug

[Speaker to Animals]

We cannot have a discourse with a few people labeling everybody "misogynists" and then deleting the responses. It's fucking ridiculous.

What makes it all the more ridiculous is that Martin is exactly the kind of person he is complaining about in the OP.

But read it now because this post will be deleted. Can't have anybody mentioning that particular irony.

[DBTrek]

I can only think of one or two people being labeled misogynists, and only then for numerous obvious reasons. Certainly labeling everyone misogynists would be silly.

But people with a history of denigrating females in thousands of posts while wishing violence in them or advocating that they be stripped of human rights - those folks are textbook definition misogynists.

/shrug

[C-Mag]

Fairly evident why women will not be posting here.
You got hostile and highly damaged males that can’t cope.
/shrug

Meh, it may be a factor, but what I think it really boils down to is that they don't have strong arguments that will stand up in debate. I would love it if they did have strong arguments that made me think about things in a different light...………… but they don't seem to exist yet.

[DBTrek]

This wouldn’t be the forum to base that perception on. It’s like joining a feminist Antifa forum and saying “I guess straight males just have no arguments. I mean, they’d be here if they did, but since none are here they must have no arguments”

No, dudes just aren’t wasting their time talking in places where hostile assholes are going to come unhinged and rant at them for pages at a time.

[Martin Hash]

Having been brigaded, I'm sure that's how women feel on this forum. Now I understand the concept of a "Safe Space." This thread may not be one but I'm willing to not try and "win" a debate, just listen and counter-argue.