Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics

[Montegriffo]

Everyone hold your breath until the police come to take me away.

[Speaker to Animals]

This is why we label you a totalitarian. You damned well know the ruling you defend here technically condemns you for that post, but you don't care because you know your batshit government only prosecutes people who don't espouse your politics.

One can only hope the ruling ideology switches and we can watch you squeal in horror at your human rights be crushed.

[Montegriffo]

My next video will be a dog trained to wag it's tail when I say 9/11.
Nobody here will mind though cos ''freedom of speech''.

[Fife]

[Fife]

[BjornP]

My next video will be a dog trained to wag it's tail when I say 9/11.
Nobody here will mind though cos ''freedom of speech''.

You're being a prat. Just because something is legal, doesn't mean you should do it or that it's acceptable to do. It's still perfectly legal to be rude and condescending to anyone in Britain, for example. Does this mean every member of British society, including yourself, "wouldn't mind" if someone was rude and condescending to yourself or someone you cared about? I don't know if your parents are still alive, but let's say they died and someone cracked a joke in the middle of their funeral service... not a racist, sexist, or any of the other sort of illegal jokes, they just called your dead parents wankers, made fun of how they died, laughed loudly during the service, that sort of thing.

Would that sort of behavior being legal mean that society condones it because just it's legal? Do you think Danes love Nazis just because we don't have a law against buying or borrowing it at the local library? Conversely do you think that allowing Communist parties to stand for election and Socialists to publicly and legally voice their opinions, you're contributing to the creation of a Communist state? That allowing Trotskyists a public voice, you're effectualizing USSR, Britain Edition?

[clubgop]

This is who they are this what they support. GCF, Monty, at all this is there support of "free speech." They hate the constitution up and down the line. 1A and 2A.

[BjornP]

Well, Monte's British, so there's not really much reason to care all that much about your constitution from his POV.

[clubgop]

Well, Monte's British, so there's not really much reason to care all that much about your constitution from his POV.

Yes I realize so the next time he wants to lecture us about policy we have no reason to care from his POV.

[Ph64]

We need another Brit to make a video, training their dog for...

"Fido, should I throw the gays off the roof? Gays off the roof Fido? Allah Ackbar Fido? Rape white women Fido?" - maybe train him to get excited at "gays off the roof", howl at Allah Ackbar, and hump the sofa at "rape the women"...

Think it'll be found "grossly offensive" in a UK court?