If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by DBTrek » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:36 pm

I think Capps should be told which of his numerous annoying habits led to the thread deletions.
Also, Capps should start a poll on whether Martin should be allowed to continue as moderator.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by StCapps » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:36 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
StCapps wrote: censor people without warning, for infractions they were completely unaware were infractions, without adequate explanation on top of it?
You are deusional, there was clear warning not to fuck with Martin's area.
No there was not. There was no warning whatsoever, and certainly no official rule that was established regarding it.
*yip*

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by C-Mag » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:37 pm

People need to know what's out of bounds.

At least with Carlin we knew personal threats were out of bounds and could get you censored.

On the other hand, this shit all started because people went from making a good joke to becoming an annoying pain in the ass.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by StCapps » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:38 pm

C-Mag wrote:People need to know what's out of bounds.

At least with Carlin we knew personal threats were out of bounds and could get you censored.
This.
*yip*

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by DBTrek » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:40 pm

This is why we need religion, guys.
Folks need to know what is out of bounds.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by StCapps » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:44 pm

DBTrek wrote:Folks need to know what is out of bounds.
Yet, on this board, we'll never find out, we'll just get censored out of nowhere, with no rules established.
*yip*

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by DBTrek » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:46 pm

StCapps wrote:
DBTrek wrote:Folks need to know what is out of bounds.
Yet, on this board, we'll never find out, we'll just get censored out of nowhere, with no rules established.
That’s fucked up, G!
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:47 pm

How about...
Don't be an asshole over and over again.
Is that an acceptable rule?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by StCapps » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:47 pm

DBTrek wrote:
StCapps wrote:
DBTrek wrote:Folks need to know what is out of bounds.
Yet, on this board, we'll never find out, we'll just get censored out of nowhere, with no rules established.
That’s fucked up, G!
Damn right.
*yip*

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.

Post by DBTrek » Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:50 pm

StCapps wrote:
DBTrek wrote:
StCapps wrote:Yet, on this board, we'll never find out, we'll just get censored out of nowhere, with no rules established.
That’s fucked up, G!
Damn right.
Somebody should do something about that.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"