If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
I think Capps should be told which of his numerous annoying habits led to the thread deletions.
Also, Capps should start a poll on whether Martin should be allowed to continue as moderator.
Also, Capps should start a poll on whether Martin should be allowed to continue as moderator.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
No there was not. There was no warning whatsoever, and certainly no official rule that was established regarding it.Montegriffo wrote:You are deusional, there was clear warning not to fuck with Martin's area.StCapps wrote: censor people without warning, for infractions they were completely unaware were infractions, without adequate explanation on top of it?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
People need to know what's out of bounds.
At least with Carlin we knew personal threats were out of bounds and could get you censored.
On the other hand, this shit all started because people went from making a good joke to becoming an annoying pain in the ass.
At least with Carlin we knew personal threats were out of bounds and could get you censored.
On the other hand, this shit all started because people went from making a good joke to becoming an annoying pain in the ass.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
This.C-Mag wrote:People need to know what's out of bounds.
At least with Carlin we knew personal threats were out of bounds and could get you censored.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
This is why we need religion, guys.
Folks need to know what is out of bounds.
Folks need to know what is out of bounds.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
Yet, on this board, we'll never find out, we'll just get censored out of nowhere, with no rules established.DBTrek wrote:Folks need to know what is out of bounds.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
That’s fucked up, G!StCapps wrote:Yet, on this board, we'll never find out, we'll just get censored out of nowhere, with no rules established.DBTrek wrote:Folks need to know what is out of bounds.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
How about...
Don't be an asshole over and over again.
Is that an acceptable rule?
Don't be an asshole over and over again.
Is that an acceptable rule?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
Damn right.DBTrek wrote:That’s fucked up, G!StCapps wrote:Yet, on this board, we'll never find out, we'll just get censored out of nowhere, with no rules established.DBTrek wrote:Folks need to know what is out of bounds.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
Somebody should do something about that.StCapps wrote:Damn right.DBTrek wrote:That’s fucked up, G!StCapps wrote:Yet, on this board, we'll never find out, we'll just get censored out of nowhere, with no rules established.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"